[Uncle Sham]

I have an answer for you. It’s in the Constitution and I’ll post it a little later tonight. Read that document. We have multiple attack points from which to press legal cases.

[Uncle Sham]

"It’s an ‘act’ of omission analogous to a policeman ‘looking the other way’ when a crime is being committed and, therefore, hard to prove."

This is not what we are facing here. What we are facing is telling a policeman, with a camera rolling as we do so, that his job is to prevent crime and in fact over there in that building we think we just saw a burglar entering the back window of the bank, then he ignores us.

I'm working on another angle of attack as well as this one, all from a Constitutional perspective. Stay tuned.

[STE=Q]

I have an answer for you. It’s in the Constitution and I’ll post it a little later tonight. Read that document.

I will!

Thanks for your reply.

STE=Q