Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LoneStarC

No mention of a requirement for concealment of the weapons?

It seems like concealment was required in the original Dept.of Interior version.

So, when BO signs this, is it immediately the law of the land? As it happens, I was planning on visiting a National Park on Friday.


22 posted on 05/20/2009 3:47:27 PM PDT by Rio (Don't make me come over there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Rio

“No mention of a requirement for concealment of the weapons?”

If you have to conceal to carry in the state, you have to in the park, if not no.

“It seems like concealment was required in the original Dept.of Interior version.”

Same effect. Just worded differently. In most cases “legal in the state” means concealed. If you are licensed to carry in the state you are standing on, you are ok in that part of the park. If a park straddles state lines and you walk over the line out of you home state, you have to have reciprocity with that state.....

“So, when BO signs this, is it immediately the law of the land? As it happens, I was planning on visiting a National Park on Friday.”

Don’t know — Usually federal laws go in immediately. If you rely on it, should carry something to show the Ranger if necessary - might save going through the frustration of getting arrested because he hadn’t heard.

On the other hand, It is concealed, right:-)


23 posted on 05/20/2009 4:00:56 PM PDT by LoneStarC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson