That may be true but that is not saying much. This is only because Bush is finally off camera, not bailing anyone out, not proposing stimulus packages or amnesty or even more war funding now.
This poster may not have seen the latest opinion polls on Bush vs Obama on national security. Obama’s defense flips are all helping him, and none of it is helping Bush. You have to put Obama’s defense flips (which are against the Move on crowd) in the context of Obama’s popularity and Bush's deep unpopularity. He is looking even more responsible than last November when he was elected. It will take time for Obama to lose this.
An issue illiterate public fed by an agenda driven media tied to power hungry socialists will tell you anything you want to hear
In April 2008, an Illinois republican army veteran told me that he went to Washington, DC, with some other Illinois veterans, and they tried to meet all of Illinois’ U.S. senators and reps., to discuss many issues, especially the Iraq war. When they went to Obama’s office, Obama was gone, campaigning. The foreign policy aide said that, if Obama becomes president, he wouldn’t withdraw all American troops, from Iraq, quickly. He would consider the advice of the generals and admirals. Obama said that he would quickly withdraw the troops because he thought that would help him win the election.
You malcontents love to talk about "amnesty", but fall silent about Bush's support of the border fence (Obama has halted both funding and construction), E-Verify (the Democrats have halted use), workplace raids (halted by Obama) and extensive deportations (also halted by Obama).
Your inclusion of "war funding" doesn't even deserve a response.
That may be true but that is not saying much. This is only because Bush is finally off camera, not bailing anyone out, not proposing stimulus packages or amnesty or even more war funding now.
~~~
WRONG!
A little in-depth reading of the facts might help.