Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Menu labeling bill introduced by U.S. lawmakers (Harkin, DeLauro)
Los Angeles Times ^ | May 16, 2009 | Jerry Hirsch

Posted on 05/19/2009 12:06:36 PM PDT by reaganaut1

Two federal lawmakers have introduced legislation to require fast-food and other chain restaurants to post calories on menu boards and food display tags. The chains also would have to put information about calories, fats, carbohydrates and salt on printed menus.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) on Thursday introduced the Menu Education and Labeling Act, called the MEAL Act for short. They said it would help consumers make more informed choices about the nutritional content of the food they are ordering.

The bill has the support of many consumer and health groups and emulates legislation signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in September that requires chain restaurants in California to display calorie counts with each menu item. That was the nation's first state law of its kind; it won the support of the California Restaurant Assn. because it standardized requirements and preempted ordinances in Santa Clara and San Francisco.

Health advocates believe that when people see the amount of calories, fat and salt in meals before they order them, they will gravitate to more healthful selections.

"Consumers play an impossible guessing game trying to make healthier choices in restaurants," said Margo Wootan, nutrition policy director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "Who would guess that a large chocolate shake at McDonald's has more calories than two Big Macs or that a multigrain bagel at Dunkin' Donuts has 140 more calories than a jelly doughnut?"

The restaurant industry is pushing a competing bill. The Labeling Education and Nutrition Act, nicknamed the LEAN Act, would require chains with more than 20 units to post calorie counts. It also would nullify state and local measures now in effect and preempt future regional measures.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; calories; nannystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: AirForceGeorge
You want to know what Outback serves you go on the internet. They'll tell you right there.

It's really not their fault you forgot to bring your i-POD with you for an instant check.

41 posted on 05/19/2009 1:05:07 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My weariness with meddlesome leftist sob’s is rapidly evolving into an intense hatred. Nobody worthy of the name ‘American’ would vote for such human dreck.


42 posted on 05/19/2009 1:06:40 PM PDT by VR-21 (The election of Barack Obama was a hate crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

but instead of fighting them, the food industry is pushing for a somewhat less intrusive bill. As long as this remains the dynamic we are all just totally screwed. (so I guess we shouldn’t hold our breath waiting for more Harry and Louise ads...)


43 posted on 05/19/2009 1:32:45 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

For Sure.


44 posted on 05/19/2009 2:18:43 PM PDT by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Health advocates believe that when people see the amount of calories, fat and salt in meals before they order them, they will gravitate to more healthful selections.

Oh BS. They just want to harass big successful companies.

Mark my words, if they get this through, they will up the ante ... next will be govt control of what restaurants can serve.

45 posted on 05/19/2009 2:20:24 PM PDT by freespirited (Is this a nation of laws or a nation of Democrats? -- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Exactly. How many years have we had this precisely this info on food products? Has the national waistline changed for the better?


46 posted on 05/19/2009 2:22:11 PM PDT by freespirited (Is this a nation of laws or a nation of Democrats? -- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Mark my words, if they get this through, they will up the ante ... next will be govt control of what restaurants can serve.

I had the same thought. Already there is talk of taxing soda to help pay for universal coverage.

47 posted on 05/19/2009 2:23:09 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

>>next will be govt control of what restaurants can serve.

Yes, and the subsequent reductions in portions.....long a holy grail. Restaurants will eagerly accept since it’ll increase their margins with smaller portions.

Bye bye to the Buffet, the Huge rack of ribs etc.


48 posted on 05/20/2009 1:41:37 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Knowing human nature, I can just see kids, boys, in their competitive ways....

Dude, I just ate 1800 calories worth of food, can you top that?


49 posted on 05/20/2009 1:43:36 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson