So the Darwiniacs are trying to have it both ways...on the one hand they label non-coding DNA as “junk”, and on the other hand they say “junk” DNA is critical to the survival of biological lineages. LOL
Goes to show the hoops that the evos jump through to make their fanciful story come true.
Either a piece of DNA is total junk, or it's useful. Period. It's that simple. If a section of DNA is found to have a transcribing region, no matter how small, than it's not "junk" - it's evidence for a Designer.
I've heard desperate evos, realizing their heyday is over, claim that these are only "small coding regions amidst the junk", like an "occasional oasis in a desert". They use some sorry excuse like "exaptation of junk code", as if bits of information could somehow be added to the once-useless code, just like in "flipping a switch". (Well, what flips the switch, and keeps it flipped, assuming that's the mechanism? Evolution has no such mechanism to do that.)
What a joke. Again, the overeducated evoloser scientists are outdone by their creationist counterparts, despite their disparate gubmint funding. The evo science wannabees need to start leaving the real research to the true pros: the Creation Scientists.
All I know is scientists keep making discoveries while you keep reaching in your diaper and flinging poo at them.