Do you then claim that it DOES give the opinion of a juror (or jurors) supremacy over the written law?
The right of jury trial and the double-jeopardy rule imply that if a jury acquits someone, its ruling is final. BTW, you ignored my baseball analogy which I think is quite relevant: if officials start ignoring the rules of the game, sportsmanship demands after a certain point that people cease to regard those officials' rulings as legitimate.