To: Stoat
One of the things that the article fails to highlight is the fact that now that the AP and Fox News have made the re-tasking of the DHS cameras worldwide news, the Port of Everett is less closely guarded than before, and the Port is now perhaps more vulnerable to criminal and perhaps terrorist infiltration and actions.Interesting point, and they have advertized to those who could put such a distraction to use a cheap and efficient way to make just that happen.
8 posted on
05/17/2009 10:46:00 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Smokin' Joe
Interesting point, and they have advertized to those who could put such a distraction to use a cheap and efficient way to make just that happen. As we have seen on so many occasions on commercial aircraft and elsewhere, terrorists just love to do 'dry runs' in order to test security in a variety of venues. It seems that some angry Rucker Hill residents have saved the terrorists considerable time and trouble and have informed the world of how easily the Port of Everett security can be distracted.
11 posted on
05/17/2009 10:50:53 AM PDT by
Stoat
(Palin / Coulter 2012: A Strong America Through Unapologetic Conservatism)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson