Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01
After WW II, we rebuilt Europe and Japan

You're leaving something out - the Philippines - the first and only US colony. I've lived in western Tokyo and Manila. One would be hard-pressed to guess which was an ally of the US and which was the enemy of the US in WWII. Manila still bears scars to this day. Western Tokyo is a bit different.

Clinton undertook "nation building" in Haiti (and Somalia) because the Left believes we should lift poor nations into prosperity with foreign aid and guidance from Harvard. There is no record of this approach ever having worked, anywhere. We can all agree on that, too, can't we?

Agreed.

Bush opted for "nation building" in Iraq because effectively fighting radical Islam required a competing idea. The idea was "freedom". Iraq as a successful democratic state would serve as a positive example to all of Islam -- and a reliable ally in the very middle of the Middle East.

Iraq was already a successful secular Islamic state and I do not agree with your premise in the slightest. President Bush campaigned on a platform of getting us out of foreign wars, not starting new ones. That's part of why I voted for him in 2000.

The Islamofascists clearly recognized the risk a successful Iraq meant to them and put everything they had into the resistance. We won't know for several years whether the gambit was successful (if the Democrats don't piss it away first) -- but initial indications are positive. Bush gets credit for his vision, even if everybody doesn't agree with the strategy.

This is a non sequitor. You may win with this sort of argument on a Democrat or a moderate, but not with me. I'm proud to be a founding-fathers Paleo-con. Let's stay out of entangling foreign affairs. Just Say No.

316 posted on 05/18/2009 1:18:54 AM PDT by altair (My vote didn't count, I voted in California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]


To: altair
Iraq was already a successful secular Islamic state...

A state with a brutal dictatorship is "successful"? I've never heard that definition before.

President Bush campaigned on a platform of getting us out of foreign wars, not starting new ones. That's part of why I voted for him in 2000.

In case you hadn't noticed, something happened after Bush was elected.

And 9/11/01 changed everything.

Let's stay out of entangling foreign affairs. Just Say No.

So, as far as your concerned, 9/11 didn't change everything. I can respect the consistency. But I also firmly disagree with your position.

332 posted on 05/18/2009 8:06:26 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson