Posted on 05/16/2009 8:13:19 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
“Why are people comforted by believing that we came from nothing? So they can live without restraints!”
I haven’t met too many people that believe we came from nothing (the Big Bang doesn’t necessarily imply such a thing). And I don’t think I’ve ever met anyone “comforted” by the Big Bang or evolution, nor anyone that would be heart broken if they were disproven. I also don’t think I’ve met anyone that thinks that we can live without restraints... I think a meeting of the NAS or NSF or the biology or cosmology departments of universities are among the last places on Earth you’d ever find an orgy. :-)
I would appreciate if you quite spamming my threads with the same graphic over and over and over and over and over.
Well you have not replied to any of the 14 points yet.
If you have a problem with evolution, you have a problem with one or more of those 14 points. Which one is it? Provide evidence that any of these points are incorrect.
Why don’t you type out your points and start your own thread challenging Creationist and IDers on FR to knock down the contents of your silly graphic. Having said that, you are chewing up an awful lot of bandwidth by posting the same catch-all graphic over and over on all my threads...not to mention the fact that what you are doing is starting to feel like stalking.
I am asking you a series of valid questions that pertain to the subject of evolution.
So far you have chosen to ignore them.
If as you say “”After sacrificing your brain to the Bearded Buddha of Naturalism, please proceed to the Comforting Lies booth for a your first tin of darwin-laced Kool-Aid.” Then these 14 questions should not be that difficult.
Your graphic has little to nothing to do with the thread. If you want to engage FReepers in a generalized debate on evolution, you are free to start your own thread. But following me around posting the same silly graphic over and over and over and over is considered spamming, not to mention stalking!
PS I hope you are making regular donations to FR to make up for all the bandwidth you are taking up by posting the same graphic over and over and over and over and over...ad infinitum.
I find it quite odd that you keep avoiding the questions posed in my text.
Seems to me if the Theory of evolution was so weak than it would be relatively easy to reply as to which one of the 14 points you have problem with along with evidence that any of these points are incorrect.
Sorry, I don’t react very well to newbie’s spamming all my threads with the same silly bandwidth-eating graphic over and over and over and over and over...ad infinitum.
So you will not answer any of the 14 points raised in my text to you?
Try posting your own thread challenging FReepers to pick the contents of your Evo-graphic apart. You post it, and I’m sure they will come.
I am interested in your response.
You go on, and on about the weaknesses of the theory of evolution.
Well here are 14 chances to show them, with supporting evidence of course.
Then type up the 14 points from your graphic, post them on your own thread, and ping me. Unlike you, I’ll actually stick to the topic of your thread.
Sounds like a deal!
I mentioned elsewhere that I have converted his 5 elements, or properties, of information (with his concurrence) into:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.