Posted on 05/16/2009 7:40:33 AM PDT by Publius
LOL. Yea, I guess. But it is pretty !!
Nice. Very good. The rule of law is diminishing, and we are becoming a banana republic.
I remember being surprised by that. As an immig. from the third world (no capitals to glorify it, thanks), this kind of thing weirds me out. But I’d forgotten it, and now I’m terrified.
What happens next, after the spread? Can it burn itself out leaving the strongest survivors?
Where is there to flee to?!
The Schumers are more sophisticated than that. He’s in the Senate and she controls MTA in NY.
I did not know that. Wasn’t Daschle’s wife a lobbyist, in effect paid to lobby him?
In an honest language, the would be called a “hooker...”
Chapter 18, “By Our Love,” is a very short chapter, one of the shortest in the novel (the next one, 19, is even shorter), and in it Rand intends to isolate one issue and address it with one crisis of conscience. She has certainly made her point by now concerning the abuse of the producers by the looters, of the achievers by the leeches, so much so that the reader is probably wondering why the whole system hasn’t already collapsed. Why do the victims persist? Why can’t they let it go? Why hasn’t everyone simply gone Galt, done a Danagger, slipped into seclusion and let the whole rotten edifice fall down? They are held in harness by love; by, as a previous chapter title has suggested, a form of white blackmail. Love of what? That’s the question we’ll explore in this chapter.
Dagny has finally had enough. Directive 10-289, the “moratorium on brains,” has sent her flying in disgust and revulsion to an old cabin in the wilderness where she can think it all out, a plot device going back at least four millennia wherein the author can speak to us through her protagonist’s internal dialogue. It isn’t any surprise that Dagny finds it impossible to turn her previous life off like a light switch. She is in the same frame of mind reported by many retirees from active working lives, feeling like a roaring engine whose load has suddenly been removed. Both engines and people can fly apart under those conditions.
She’s game about the whole attempt, though, building paths to assuage her relentless drive to build something, fighting the ennui of a shopkeeper by making the simple suggestion that she move her produce out of the sun. The latter is so worn down by it all that she answers bovinely, “It’s always been there.” It is what much of the world is becoming and Dagny doesn’t fit into that world at all and so she retreats to the cabin, where her old friend and lover Francisco arrives to comfort her. He knows the price of giving up what one loves (and will relearn it through the rest of the novel). Dagny is only now getting her first taste.
She wonders how he found her, and asks him if Eddie, the only person in whom she has confided her location, has told him. No, he hasn’t seen Eddie for more than a year, but Rand gives us a clue that something or someone is a go-between, for the chatterbox Eddie was, in fact, the only one who did know where she was.
Francisco at last admits openly what we have known all along:
“I am destroying d’Anconia Copper, consciously, deliberately, by plan and by my own hand.”
…and that he is doing it to prevent that remarkable achievement from helping to sustain the cosmic fraud that is the looters’ creed, as it has for a century and a half. Like Ellis Wyatt he intends to “leave it as I found it,” not as he personally found it but as his ancestor did. For the oil industry, whose tools are derricks and machine-tooled drills, that is the work of a few moments only. For the mining industry, whose tools are pick and shovel, it takes quite a bit more effort. Dagny is astonished to realize that the knowing destruction of what he most loves has become his life’s work.
To Dagny that is inconceivable, in the exact sense of the word. Builder that she is, it strikes her as profoundly immoral, a rejection of everything that man is.
But the work of building a path was a living sum, so that no day was left to die behind her, but each day contained all those that preceded it, each day acquired its immortality on every succeeding tomorrow. A circle, she thought, is the movement proper to physical nature…but the straight line is the badge of man, the straight line of a geometrical abstraction that makes roads, rails, and bridges, the straight line that cuts the curving aimlessness of nature by a purposeful motion from a start to an end.
Certain Gaia-worshippers of my acquaintance would shrink in horror from such blasphemy. And yet the straight line is not really an artifact of man, but his imitation of the horizon. The horizon isn’t perfectly straight, of course, either in terms of curvature or of granularity, but then neither are the lines made by men. In this man is one with his world whether he likes it or not.
The truly straight line is, as Dagny just said, an abstraction, an artifact not even of man’s mind if Immanuel Kant is to be believed, but an a priori concept that is one of the laws of the universe that form the foundation of Ayn Rand’s epistemology. It is there, but we can only imitate it in such worshipful constructions as a railroad track reaching toward the horizon. To Dagny that makes that track’s destruction, either deliberate or merely by allowing it to happen, an act of apostasy.
And this is why she is not yet ready despite Francisco’s hopeful overtures. One feels for the fellow – he has not only become such an apostate himself, but has given up the woman he loves in doing so. Does he hope to win her back now that the charade is known? For she is close, so very close to the realization that abnegation of all of this is the price that they must pay for the sin of selling it too cheaply.
“You, the heir of the d’Anconias…you’re turning your matchless ability to the job of destruction. And I – I’m playing with cobblestones and shingling a roof while a transcontinental railroad system is collapsing in the hands of congenital ward heelers. Yet you and I were the kind who determine the fate of the world. If this is what we let it come to, then it must have been our own guilt. But I can’t see the nature of our error.”
“We never demanded the one payment that the world owed us – and we let our best reward go to the worst of men…Dagny, this is not a battle over material goods. It’s a moral crisis, the greatest the world has ever faced and the last. Our age is the climax of centuries of evil. We, the men of the mind…it was our own guilt. We produced the wealth of the world – but we let our enemies write its moral code. Your unrequited rectitude is the only hold they have upon you. They know it. You don’t. You won’t be free of them until you do. But when you do, you’ll reach such a stage of rightful anger that you’ll blast every rail of Taggart Transcontinental rather than let it serve them!”
“But to leave it to them!” she moaned. “To abandon it…when it’s…it’s almost like a living person…”
Her child by Hank Rearden, in fact, if we are to believe Lilian’s mocking. We should remember this cry later when we come to consider whether the act of abnegation does include living people. It is an extremely cruel choice, but if Francisco is to be believed the men of the mind brought it upon themselves.
She can’t do it. It is a good general rule that radios should not be left on during existential crises but hers was, and its siren sound is that of a newscaster informing the world of the Taggart Tunnel disaster.
Had the reserve diesel whose availability Dagny made her strictest rule not been reassigned to a political hack, the train would have made it through the tunnel. Pulled by an ancient coal-fired train belching poisonous fumes and struggling to make the grade at forty, the chances aren’t good, and once the choking passengers pull the emergency stop cord, there is no chance at all. One poor fireman manages to stagger out the other end of the tunnel before the oncoming ammunition train rear-ends the unfortunate Comet. Perhaps the passengers were all dead at that point, but the resulting explosion made sure of it and brought the mountain down around them. It is the greatest train disaster in history.
…she whirled to the door and ran. “Dagny!” he screamed. “Don’t go back! Dagny! In the name of anything sacred to you, don’t go back!”
But it is in the name of that which is sacred to Dagny that she does go back. And that is the premise that she has left unchecked.
It has been four weeks – 28 days since the declaration of Directive 10-289, and in that time yet another double handful of Dagny’s most crucial people have quit. Taggart is in a state of paralysis, with James’s resignation letter grinning at him from his desk. And she is back, their savior, as if there were anything left worth saving. This is not an act of sacrifice on Dagny’s part, it is an irresistible, existential moment. The situation is a challenge, a drug to an addict, the sound of guns to a warhorse not yet ready to be put to pasture. To give it up would be to give up not just Taggart Transcontinental, but herself. No wonder she can’t do it!
She calls Hank.
“I’m back.”
“I suppose I’d better start bribing people at once to get the ore to start pouring rail for you.”
“Hank, I don’t think they care whether there’s a train or a blast furnace left on earth. We do. They’re holding us by our love of it, and we’ll go on paying so long as there’s still one chance left to keep one single wheel alive…”
Precisely so. “By our love.” And so Rand has answered the question suggested by the chapter title. She should have stopped there.
“…when the flood swallows it we’ll go down with the last wheel and the last syllogism…”
Egad. The thud of that clunker hurts the ears, and unfortunately the chapter ends two sentences later so that it reverberates in our head like a lead weight falling down the basement stairs. The last what? If there’s one thing a high-test-fueled, ballbusting railroad executive isn’t going to be invoking with her world in flaming wreckage around her, it’s a syllogism. If the word even occurred to Dagny at that moment I’d have to reach for the straitjacket.
But it would to Rand the thinker. Here the author has so closely identified with her protagonist that there is no longer a filter of fiction between thought and utterance. Odd, really – Rand was a perfectly competent Hollywood scriptwriter – dialogue was second nature to her, but this one rings false. It’s just something to watch out for. When it happens, Dagny has lost her own voice and we lose Dagny.
And we don’t want to do that at this point, because we like her and she’s placed herself right back in the fray. Something she loves too much to give up is a chain that she’s put on herself, stronger than the one of Rearden Metal that she wears on her wrist, and her enemies hold the other end.
Have a great week, Publius!
Ironically, China is freer than America. There is a problem with corruption, and politically you have to keep your mouth shut, but beyond that the tax bite is less.
The trucking industry is looking at competition with Mexican trucks and drivers within our borders, free trade y'know. I've seen the standards that are used south of the border and I want nothing to do with traveling on the same roads with those accidents looking for a place to happen.
Without ethics, we’re toast.
In order for the physical world to fall into third world disarray, there first must be the fall of the minds of the people. The people, the movers and shakers of the society must fall from their ideals of work ethic, doing your best and the concept that what you produce is the representation of your self. People used to do their best work, not because their bosses required it, but because it provided a sense of satisfaction. In a rising society, the ambitious, highly motivated and talented rise to the top and the society flourishes. When ambition becomes a mockery and success is seen as proof “trampling the rights of the workers”, The society itself starts to spiral down.
Lets look at a segment of current society, black culture. It has become unpopular for black teens to do poor in school, to achieve, because it makes them look too “white,” Intellectual failure and mediocrity has become the cultural standard, the only acceptable fields of achievement is sports, music or crime. This guarantees limited success in the greater society, further marginalizing the culture, dooming most to the welfare culture.
A second facet is the rise of the union lackey. The strangulation of the major industries by the union culture is to blame for the attitude that it is not in our best interest to work hard and achieve, but to “make do. I worked in an environment many years ago where if you worked real hard and achieved, you stood out too much and became a target. Rising up the career ladder was the result of butt kissing and schmoozing, not achievement. This lays the groundwork for the culture of corruption, of “pull” that is in full bloom in AS.
If one looks at current third world nations today, many of them were former colonial societies. During occupation, they were built up to the technological standards of the day by the occupying force, most of them European. They worked by the old standard of doing your best. With liberation, came in those with marxist ideas came into the forefront. The culture of corruption, of “pull” became the standard of operation. When the culture of pull is the rule, those who strive to do their best see it for what it is and they “shrug” that society. It leaves the looters to destroy. Cuba, Zimbabwe, Mexico, Venezuela all come to mind. Where did the producers of those societies go? Mostly to the US.
This is probably the most I’ve commented on these threads, because I think I identified with Dagny during her self-imposed exile this past week. I have been on vacation for 3 weeks, mostly because I have too much PTO this year and need to use it or lose it. Due to circumstances, I had no real travel plans, so I used the time to do all sorts of home projects. I clean, sorted, painted, planted and improved all sorts of things around the house. I kinda worked harder at home then I frequently do at work. They idea of just sitting around watching TV? I’d go nuts. Thats the difference I guess between the producing class and the welfare class.
When I was told that promotions in the company in which I worked were based on politics, rather than achievement -- I retired. Best decision I ever made.
I have been on vacation for 3 weeks, mostly because I have too much PTO this year and need to use it or lose it. Due to circumstances, I had no real travel plans, so I used the time to do all sorts of home projects. I clean, sorted, painted, planted and improved all sorts of things around the house. I kinda worked harder at home then I frequently do at work. They idea of just sitting around watching TV? I’d go nuts.
That's when I turn to FR. In moments of doubt, I FReep.
Publius, I'm surprised. You certainly haven't given the impression here that you would have had to be told about that type of advancement in your company.
Myself, well, I'll say that my first inkling of how the system works happened when I was still wet behind the ears. I was working for a large (really large) international company and had been accepted into a skilled trades apprenticeship due to start up within a few months. A lot can happen in a few months and in my case it was a surge of Vietnamese 'Boat People'. To make a short story shorter, I was bumped out of my position to become an apprentice so there would be an opening for the above mentioned. It truly was an eye opening experience at a young age and caused me to have a different perspective from that time on.
I want to mention for any of the 'Boat People' who happen to be reading this that I never blamed them that they were given preference because it wasn't their doing. The department head explained that the dictate came from Washington and had to be complied with, no questions asked.
First lesson learned at HKU.
There are times when I can be really dense.
After posting I thought the same of myself. I saw that the first line could be misinterpreted and I'll correct that now by stating that your posts reflect both an observant and perceptive mind thus my surprise.
Thanks again for another chapter!
How about food production and distribution? It isn't so much third world as like shopping in the old Soviet Union. When I was a kid, you could get great cuts of delicious meat at the local butcher, bread and yummy donuts at the bakery, milk and cheese at the dairy - and this was in western PA.
There were also supermarkets springing up - bright and shiny with packed shelves and plenty of bargains. Eventually there were so many supermarkets, the little butchers and bakers and dairy stores disappeared.
It's been gradual, but I see supermarkets declining. The shelves are packed with boxes of processed stuff, but try to find a decent cut of meat, produce that doesn't look like crap or cheese that doesn't taste like plastic. Often things sell out and it is many days before it's restocked, or the products are way past their expiration date. I often have to go to multiple stores just to get all the groceries on my list. The stores seem dirty and there's never anyone who can answer a question (and you don't want to even see the people packaging meat in back or you won't want to touch the stuff!). I don't remember it being this way even 20 years ago. Is it just me, or is something happening to our food distribution?
Let me give you an example.
Once upon a time you could go to the store and buy tomatoes that were ripe, sweet and just perfect for some olive oil, salt, pepper, garlic power and oregano -- along with some good crusty French bread. Then came standardization, and the tomatoes were hard, unripe, but of a standard size. If you put them in a plastic bag with some bananas, they would ripen properly, but otherwise, forget it. Today you have to go to a gourmet market or greengrocer to get "heirloom tomatoes" that cost an arm and a leg -- but they are ripe and edible.
You might actually get a better tomato in the Third World than America, though.
Well, I have my traditional two tomato plants in the Michigan ground for this season. But I had no idea that you should put store-bought tomatoes in a bag with bananas so they would ripen properly. It’s amazing what I’ve learned in this book club! Thank again.
Or just grow them yourself. Careful though, Uncle Sugar is watching, and apparently none too happy that there are still a few things we can do without so much as a “by your leave” to the feds.
Ethylene gas is what causes ripening, and bananas ripen so quickly that they give off excess ethylene. If you want something to ripen quickly, put it in a plastic bag with some bananas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.