Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueStateBlues
Handcuffing in the front is not safer for the police transporting an arrestee. Some departments require cuffing in the back.

HOWEVER, when you have an 80 year old priest, you might take a "risk" and provide him Some confort so as not to injure him.

Is TSA still body searching 80 year old ladies in wheelchairs? Same mentality.

52 posted on 05/16/2009 7:35:47 AM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, school and passport records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: nufsed

> Handcuffing in the front is not safer for the police transporting an arrestee. Some departments require cuffing in the back.

In New Zealand it is optional for the police to use handcuffs/restraints when arresting or transporting someone. Plenty of times they are not used at all. The decision is made based on likely risk presented by the person being detained. Handcuffing is, after all, a use of force.

I think that is an utterly commonsense approach. There was neither reason nor excuse to restrain this priest. It was a shameful misuse of force.


74 posted on 05/16/2009 7:52:59 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson