Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kenny Bunk
I cant see the better long range advantage over the 7.62 or as I like to call it the .308 Winchester....

I can see the more rounds per pound issue though.

I took my M-1 garand out of the safe yesterday and was out of breath carrying it upstairs...not being young anymore I have an excuse, but still, you hike all day with an 11 lb weapon, and I can see you wanting to dump it for a 7 lb weapon with the ability to carry a whole bunch of extra ammo.

25 posted on 05/13/2009 8:13:31 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Vaquero

.308 is a strong round. 30.06 is a lot stronger.


30 posted on 05/13/2009 8:21:27 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero
7.62 or as I like to call it the .308 Winchester...

Apparently, and I am not at all sure of the actual metrics, but I have been recently instructed that the two rounds are not quite identical, and one should not use the MILSPEC ammo in a civilian .308. Or is it vice-versa?

I date back to the M-14, and also have hunted with a .308. The .308 is a great round, and easily available in all kinds of interesting loads.

31 posted on 05/13/2009 8:24:36 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The Election of 2008: Given the choice between stupid and evil, the stupid chose evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson