Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nat Turner

FN also make the M4s. Anyway I soldiered with a Colt model
and found it perfectly adequate. plastic is fine as long as you aren’t planning on using the vertical buttstroke feature.


15 posted on 05/13/2009 7:46:32 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: rahbert

I was a tanker and got familiar with the FN from the M240 MG. It was rugged, disassembled quick and cleaned quickly. I never had an M4, the 240 was far better than the M60 and a lot lighter than Ma Deuce or the M85.


47 posted on 05/13/2009 9:11:14 AM PDT by Nat Turner (Proud two term solider in the 2nd Infantry Div 84-85; 91-92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: rahbert
Anyway I soldiered with a Colt model and found it perfectly adequate. plastic is fine as long as you aren’t planning on using the vertical buttstroke feature.

Same way here, put quite a few rounds through the XM16, utilized most versions through the M-4 with few problems... although out of all the weapons I've operated with, the M-14 would be the "One", and with all that wood (or heavy high impact plastics), the "buttstroke" is highly effective... ;-)

61 posted on 05/13/2009 1:00:04 PM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson