[scripter]

What else would they mean when they say "there is no gay gene?"

You changed the subject.

Here is what you said:

Unruh and Byrd to say there is no genetic component. Such a statement is just as unscientific and unjustified as the "genetics only" crowd on the other side of the coin.

and now you're saying:

What else would they mean when they say "there is no gay gene?"

A genetic component is not a gene so don't equate the two.

Perhaps Unruh and Byrd are more familar with the subject than you realize.

[r9etb]

You changed the subject.

Nope. You're just defending a stupid statement.