Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Post-Neolithic

For more recent examples:
I got one of the Wolfdales with the bad temp sensor in it.

Doesn’t matter much though - running 4ghz+ without a temp increase anyway so it was a moot point - but still: their fault for crappy quality control. I could probably push this thing up high enough to degrade it because of the volt increase without a temp increase even: but any way you want to slice it the cpu is still “defective” because of that temp sensor. As it is, I wish I had some more accurate readings from the onboard instead of having to use a secondary sensor to read the temp.

I can’t complain about the raw performance however as it rocks socks. My point is just that your right - they have a history of shipping bad cpu’s.

However in fairness - AMD has had its own issues as well - just not anywhere near as many as Intel.


44 posted on 05/13/2009 7:41:36 AM PDT by midmoschmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: midmoschmo
"However in fairness - AMD has had its own issues as well - just not anywhere near as many as Intel."

You mention a single Intel processor with a temp sensor issue. Take any AMD CPU and try running it without a fan. < poof > As a general statement, Intel processors are much, much more thermally robust than AMD CPUs, and they have some patents on automatic clock-rate scale-back that have kept them that way.
67 posted on 05/13/2009 8:41:19 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson