Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intel fined record $1.45 billion in AMD antitrust case
engadget.com ^ | May 13th 2009 | Thomas Ricker

Posted on 05/13/2009 4:26:12 AM PDT by paudio

The verdict is in and it's huge. As expected, the EU is fining Intel a record €1.06 billion or $1.45 billion (Billion!) dollars due to violations of antitrust rules in Europe. The record fine surpasses that of the €497 million fine originally levied against Microsoft. The EU ruled that Intel illegally used hidden rebates to squeeze rivals out of the marketplace for CPUs. In a statement issued by European Union Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes, the EC said,

(Excerpt) Read more at engadget.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: amd; antitrust; eu; intel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: 1010RD

Definitely not directed to you. Just for your information.


61 posted on 05/13/2009 2:36:37 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Let’s have our country stick to the rule of law and not bow to politics or socialism.

We’ve got enough government and politics for now.

The EU is a monster aka socialist empire. It will ruin itself.


62 posted on 05/13/2009 2:36:47 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

Very thoughtful comments on unions. That is a line of reasoning you can use with Libs.


63 posted on 05/13/2009 2:38:39 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Maybe!


64 posted on 05/13/2009 3:31:00 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

“Our companies should boycott Europe.”


Amen. If you think Europe is Amerca’s ally think again.

Problem is that 0bama will drive more American companies to Europe because of high taxes. Then we will become more and more like Honduras.


65 posted on 05/13/2009 6:19:17 PM PDT by GreyMountainReagan (Liberals do not view the book 1984 as a warning but as a textbook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Post-Neolithic

Your links don’t support your contention that Intel was on the brink of going belly-up.

I knew some of its top process engineers well in the timeframe in question. Unless my incipient Alzheimer’s has taken a real leap in the past hour, at no point were they on any brink of any belly-up.


66 posted on 05/13/2009 8:38:31 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: midmoschmo
"However in fairness - AMD has had its own issues as well - just not anywhere near as many as Intel."

You mention a single Intel processor with a temp sensor issue. Take any AMD CPU and try running it without a fan. < poof > As a general statement, Intel processors are much, much more thermally robust than AMD CPUs, and they have some patents on automatic clock-rate scale-back that have kept them that way.
67 posted on 05/13/2009 8:41:19 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice
"Happened to Microsoft in the 90's too, and millions of people lost a ton of money because Clinton went after Microsoft."

Ah, but there's much much more to that than most people realize.

Keep in mind that the Reno Justice Dept's lead plaintiff was Netscape. And Netscape's largest investor at the time was the private venture fund of AmerIndo Investment Advisors. The name is the clue: as Forbes reported, it was named for its Indonesian-Chinese billionaire investors. Now, isn't it interesting that the Clinton White House chose to target its biggest antitrust operation in a manner that just happened to benefit Indonesian-Chinese billionaires? Seems that was a running theme at the Clinton White House...

I've posted much more on this in the past. Google [Vilar, site:freerepublic.com] and enjoy. Unfortunately, the inane Monica Lewinsky kerfuffle held the attention of the press as this was going on.
68 posted on 05/13/2009 8:45:36 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

This will strain relations with the neo-Soviet EU.


69 posted on 05/14/2009 12:18:36 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rock N Jones

Digital received the sale of that fab to Intel at a very nice price.

I never said Intel couldn’t run their plants well. I just said they stole some of the technology they sell. At least according to court documents and public statements at the time.

If Intel wasn’t guilty they wouldn’t have purchased the building, equipment, and employees where the technology was made.


70 posted on 05/14/2009 3:41:10 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Really makes no difference what I post, or for that matter what links I supply. There are plenty more to be found just by searching. Those just happen to be the ones that stood out for me. I have been in the computer industry long before IBM PC's came about.

I remember very vividly the number of irate customers that wanted to return their machine and or sue INTEL. The CEO at the time stated that there was nothing wrong with their CPU's for the average user, and as such they would not be replacing them. Within 1 week of his idiotic statement, our phones were ringing off the hook.

Not long after, INTEL decided that they would in fact replace said CPU's, talk in the industry was that INTEL was getting an earful from their distributors and customers. Having said that, what do you think would have happened if he stuck by his original statement?

71 posted on 05/14/2009 3:57:23 AM PDT by Post-Neolithic (Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Post-Neolithic

And...

At no point were they “at the brink of going belly up”...

Did you know that the first IBM PC, the PC-1 had a ROM bug that caused IBM’s supplied Basic to give a seriously wrong result by doing a specific combination of addition followed by a divide?

That was fun...


72 posted on 05/14/2009 6:04:33 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“Digital received the sale of that fab to Intel at a very nice price”
$700 million was reported to have been paid for the fab. I don’t know what you mean “nice price”? Are you trying to say Intel paid more than it was worth?

“If Intel wasn’t guilty they wouldn’t have purchased the building, equipment, and employees where the technology was made”
Intel still has the fab and it has been a profitable operation. Digital got nothing for the claim that Intel stole their technology. Why didn’t they get at least a $1.45 billion?

The subject matter though is the fine that the EU levied against Intel. Apparently you agree that the fine is appropriate and not excessive and glad to see that the EU is intervening in America’s technology. I don’t!


73 posted on 05/14/2009 6:31:16 AM PDT by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Rock N Jones

“Apparently you agree that the fine is appropriate and not excessive and glad to see that the EU is intervening in America’s technology. I don’t!”

really where did I ever say that? the EU is an oppressive regime


74 posted on 05/14/2009 8:41:06 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Post-Neolithic

Well, let’s both agree that Intel had a PR nightmare on their hands. We can disagree about Intel being on any sort of financial brink when they finally caved, though that may well have come as their OEMs were starting to riot. And Intel caved because the CEO’s original statement (that the average user would see a math error only every gazillion years) was quickly proven untrue. I remember typing in a simple formula into Excel which resulted in a bogus answer. That sort of thing spread like wildfire, exposing the CEO as either a liar or clueless or both, and Intel was cornered. The result was a $500 million charge against earnings to pay for the recall. That surely pinched, but let’s face it, that’s a small fraction of what Intel earned even then.

One consequence of this affair was one of the most annoying advertising blitzes ever, shortly after the dust settled. Remember the jitterbugging cleanroom guys, dancing around in bunny suits? The horror!


75 posted on 05/14/2009 8:49:14 AM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“really where did I ever say that?”

Well what you said was that Intel stole Dec technology and they did not steal Dec’s technology. They were allegations made by the Dec CEO Bill Palmer at the time Dec was going and in fact Dec went broke. The company was split up and Intel bought the fabs and the allegations were dropped.


76 posted on 05/14/2009 11:57:29 AM PDT by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Rock N Jones

‘Well what you said was that Intel stole Dec technology and they did not steal Dec’s technology”

Well Dec didn’t give the technology to them so how exactly did they get it?


77 posted on 05/14/2009 12:00:17 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“Well Dec didn’t give the technology to them so how exactly did they get it?”

What technology are you talking about that Intel stole? You keep saying Intel stole Dec technology. What did they stesl?

You never answered whether you thought the price of the Hudson, Mass fab was excessive or not?


78 posted on 05/15/2009 4:33:36 AM PDT by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

It’s legal for a monopolist to compete on price, but when they tie rebates or price incentives to excluding the competitors product then they are engaged in behavior that is counter to a free market. I’m not sure exactly what Intel was doing, but I suspect it was analogous to MS deals that required a license payment for every PC shipped by companies they do business with regardless of whether or not Windows was installed. Note that companies that are not considered monopolies get to make the deals that a monopolist would be fined for making.


79 posted on 05/19/2009 8:31:46 PM PDT by amchugh (large and largely disgruntled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson