Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Legislation Coming This Week To Guarantee All Muni Bonds
the business insider ^ | 5/12/09

Posted on 05/12/2009 1:16:57 PM PDT by FromLori

Federal government set to backstop all 50 states. One of the most insane ideas we've heard of may soon become reality.

Fox Biz is reporting that the House Financial Services Committee is set to take up legislation this week that would establish a federal backstop for all Municipal bonds and muni insurance.

This would, of course, represent another massive expansion of the government's guarantees and turn all states into Fannie and Freddy.

Here are the details, again per Fox Business:

Create a liquidity facility through the Federal Reserve to purchase municipal bonds, much like what the Federal Reserve does with mortgage-backed and federal government bonds. Form a temporary federal government program to reinsure municipal bond insurers. Almost all municipalities buy bond insurance because it boosts their credit ratings. The cost of the insurance is usually lower than the higher interest payments that come with a lower credit rating. If the insurer runs into financial trouble, then the credit ratings on the municipal bonds drop because there is doubt about the insurance. Government backing would eliminate that concern. Provide additional regulation for financial advisors to municipalities. Many, including former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt, have been calling for stronger oversight of the municipal bond market in the wake of pay-to-play bond scandals, in which banks and advisers have made gifts or political contributions, and received financing jobs along with the fees for those jobs. Representative Frank has in the past criticizes muni bond raters for downgrading muni debt during a time of recession, not because such downgrades aren't warranted, but because a higher cost of capital is counter-stimulative. Of course, California is on the verge of bankruptcy, and investors should be extremely cautious lending to the state.

We almost wonder whether the entire purpose of this program is to bail out California, which, if it went bankrupt, could cause a cascade of problems, as the debt market shuts off completely for other states, while muni insurers -- who have modeled extremely low default rates -- potentially go belly up.

Politically, it's probably easier to just backstop the whole damn market than to target aid at the worst states.

Of course, all these guarantees are predicated on the idea that this is a temporary blip and that revenues will return to normal as the economy grows again. We don't think it will, and we don't think there's any way California (or any other state) can return to revenues that only seemed normal during a bubble.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: munibonds; municipalbonds

1 posted on 05/12/2009 1:16:57 PM PDT by FromLori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FromLori
States, cities towns, overs spent, now every one pays.

So what if the Federal government is printing $.50 on the dollar. What could go wrong.

2 posted on 05/12/2009 1:19:30 PM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

Unreal...simply unreal.


3 posted on 05/12/2009 1:23:07 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Wow, the moral hazard motherload.

I’m beginning to think Obama is making all the wrong moves on purpose...


4 posted on 05/12/2009 1:25:19 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (control the teleprompter, control the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Isn’t your city broke? And aren’t they continuing to spend like nothing has happened? Ours is and is.


5 posted on 05/12/2009 1:25:57 PM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
Isn’t your city broke?

My small town is actually doing pretty well considering. That cesspool to my east, Chicago, however is a different story.

Fortunately during the last election in April the entire "old guard" town council was swept out and the first thing the new Board did was cancel about 35 million dollars in new spending the old idiots had planned.

L

6 posted on 05/12/2009 1:28:34 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Do they think these cities that are in trouble are going to be able to reduce costs and increase revenue so as to pay off these bonds?

How is this any different than Fannie Mae taking on the debt of people it knew couldn’t re-pay?


7 posted on 05/12/2009 1:42:36 PM PDT by Roccus (The Capitol, the White House, the Court House...........America's Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Municiple bonds are free of federal taxes because they are strictly a creation of the states and cities, so the federal government cannot tax them. However, if the federal government insures them, are they still considered strictly local creations or are they now open to federal taxation?
8 posted on 05/12/2009 1:47:00 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (No free man bows to a foreign king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Municiple -> Municipal
9 posted on 05/12/2009 1:48:23 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (No free man bows to a foreign king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson