Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miss CA keeps crown -- and a more honest "gay" record than Obama and Crist?
SFGate: Bronstein at Large ^ | 5/12/9 | Phil Bronstein

Posted on 05/12/2009 1:08:53 PM PDT by SmithL

Carrie Prejean didn't lie to beauty pageant officials even though she'd appeared semi-nude in photos a few years back, so let's just get off that high Godiva horse right now.

Here's the thing: Since the old pictures were of her real breasts, she never actually exposed the new breasts she's now using for contests. Those were the old, God-given breasts, see? So, technically speaking, the world has never actually gotten a look at her current breasts. No exposure, no violation of pageant rules. Case closed.

I may not know this for a true fact because I'm not canonballing into the NSFW cesspool of sin and traceability that would be required to actually look at the photos closely. I'll take Trump's word for it that they're "lovely." But that's my theory and this is a blog and I'm sticking to it like adhesive. Also, while we may be slicing the silicon a little thin, this kind of parsing was used by Bill Clinton in his Lewinsky defense.

If it's good enough for presidents, it should be OK for Ms. Prejean. And that goes for public toplessness and personal beliefs about same-sex marriage, both of which she shares with Barack Obama. Only, unlike the President and his continuation to date of the Don't Ask/Don't Tell policy in the US military, the beauty queen is not firing anyone for being gay. In fact I think she said during the Miss USA contest that she respected gayness. Apparently the military is about to can Dan Choi, a gay armed services Arab linguist -- aren't we looking for more of those, at least the Arab linguist part? -- under the existing rules. He must have told someone.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bronstein; carrieprejean; homosexualagenda; missuniverse; pageant; thedonald; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2009 1:08:53 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I have deep moral qualms about fake breasts. In the venue of a beauty contest, I consider it cheating.

I judge a woman's beauty by what she's got, not what she's bought.

2 posted on 05/12/2009 1:11:38 PM PDT by I Buried My Guns (I just hope CW2 comes before my creaky knees give out completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns

That said, I have no moaral qualms about spending a cold Alaskan winter in an igloo with Miss Prejean.


3 posted on 05/12/2009 1:12:33 PM PDT by I Buried My Guns (I just hope CW2 comes before my creaky knees give out completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns

Carrie looked pretty good pre-op.


4 posted on 05/12/2009 1:13:17 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns

“I judge a woman’s beauty by what she’s got, not what she’s bought.”

I guess the same could be said about men and viagra....


5 posted on 05/12/2009 1:14:24 PM PDT by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns

6 posted on 05/12/2009 1:14:35 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I'm not canonballing into the NSFW cesspool of sin and traceability that would be required to actually look at the photos closely.

I very humbly and reluctantly volunteer for that nasty job.

7 posted on 05/12/2009 1:14:41 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is the new (old) talking point.

She lied.

Rush lies.

Bush lied.

GHW Bush lied.

Well, we all know exactly who the liars are. And it’s none of the above.


8 posted on 05/12/2009 1:23:45 PM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns

Too late. Me and Ms Prejean are already heating up the igloo together, LOL.


9 posted on 05/12/2009 1:23:59 PM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

How’s Phil’s foot these days?

Remember

‘Night of the Iguana?’

Chomp!


10 posted on 05/12/2009 1:34:40 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Donald Trump is a total scumbag who only considers himself when it comes to making news. He’s in the Chuckie Schumer mold when it comes to advertising himself-in his world everything is about Donald Trump...he’s a turd and he’ll never change.


11 posted on 05/12/2009 1:35:21 PM PDT by Larry381 ("in the final instance civilization is always saved by a platoon of soldiers" Oswald Spengler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Don’t go to Hollywood or be around celebs or elistists. 99.9 percent have had something done.


12 posted on 05/12/2009 1:46:36 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry381
he’s a turd and he’ll never change.

Agreed.

But from my perspective he made the right call on Prejean. She was being ridden out of town on a rail by the screeching MSM for saying that marriage for her was between a man and a woman.

Trump noted that was the same position held by Obama.

Think how much publicity has been generated by this little furor. Enough that Prejean was an immediate celebrity, no matter how the Miss USA thing turned out.

13 posted on 05/12/2009 1:51:25 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns

I agree in principle with you. However, from what I hear it was the contest that got her those breast implants. Besides, the very idea that only women like these contestants are beautiful is unreal.

I am glad that she was not removed. Her retention of the crown is a triumph over the anti-Christian, anti-free speech witch hunt by the liberals. Kudos to Donald Trump!


14 posted on 05/12/2009 2:06:02 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns
That said, I have no moaral qualms about spending a cold Alaskan winter in an igloo with Miss Prejean. I'll wager you'd spend a night in the Sahara, or any other place, with Miss California! tee hee.
15 posted on 05/12/2009 2:07:35 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The staff of the Miss California pagent and all the judges who supported her ouster like Perez Hilton, should have heard The Donald say, “You’re fired!”


16 posted on 05/12/2009 2:09:25 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry381
Donald Trump is a total scumbag who only considers himself when it comes to making news. Too bad you can't see the good that he has done in this instance, as well as in the case of the other woman that he defended. Trump should be applauded for not allowing the liberal witch hunt to prevail.
17 posted on 05/12/2009 2:13:41 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oneamericanvoice
Implants or not, I am proud of her for taking a stance on traditional marriage, and still not backing down.

It is breath-taking that today someone taking a stance on traditional marriage is considered controversial.

18 posted on 05/12/2009 2:29:22 PM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
What precisely is "semi-nude"? When she vouched that she nad never posed nude, or semi-nude, this must have had a precise and specific meaning.

If in the alleged "semi-nude" photo (modeling underwear) she was indeed underage (<18yoa), then would this not technically be "kiddie porn"? And anyone who sends or receives this material is guilty of violating both state and federal laws for trafficing?

19 posted on 05/12/2009 2:47:39 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting
When she vouched that she nad never posed nude, or semi-nude, this must have had a precise and specific meaning.

It wasn't frontal. It was backal.

20 posted on 05/12/2009 10:13:23 PM PDT by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson