Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tc45a
Better than post #55, I went to www.tmz.com, the publisher of the "topless" pics.

Guess what? What you see in post #55 is all you see there - partial breast with no nipples (only the red stars) in the originals.

These are not even "topless" let alone "nude" or "semi-nude." Topless is full breast and nipples. [If you want to see examples I'll send you as many links as you want.]

But I guess different definitions apply when leftists are out to smear those who dare speak against the propaganda line.

You may call them "suggestive", but if you call them "topless" you are revealing more about yourself than Miss California revealed of herself in all the photos.

126 posted on 05/12/2009 2:39:33 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: drpix
Guess what? What you see in post #55 is all you see there - partial breast with no nipples (only the red stars) in the originals. These are not even "topless" let alone "nude" or "semi-nude." Topless is full breast and nipples. [If you want to see examples I'll send you as many links as you want.]

Would you feel comfortable if your daughter had pics in that degree of undress??

BTW; I agre with what she said during the pagent. I just don't think she is a proper conservative role model. Especially after just listening to her on Hannity when she said she turned Christian at age 16 or 17. Christians don't have pics taken of themselves in that manner.

127 posted on 05/12/2009 3:00:31 PM PDT by tc45a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson