Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero

“As I read this I am thinking of how the grunts on the ground dubbed the “new” M-16 a “Matty Matel” back in the day.”

It is supposedly a myth, but I have had seen (apparently) very knowledgeable weapons people swear that Mattel was one of several companies that produced some of the plastic parts, and that they have seen the “Mattel” stamp on the butt or handgrip.

I have never seen the stamp, myself.


65 posted on 05/12/2009 9:51:49 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: MeanWestTexan

I’m a Garand kind of guy...My idea of high tech is the M-14. But I was just down in my safe and hefting one of my 10lb M-1’s and can understand going to to the M-16 for weight purposes...though I prefer a larger round and though not as accurate I would rather carry an AK than an AR for close quarter fighting
I find the 5.56/.223 and excellent woodchuck round.

Just my opinion.


68 posted on 05/12/2009 10:46:34 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson