[Lera]

He forgot to add that if you teach traditional values to your children that you could in the eyes of the law you could now be seen as doing your children harm. This would give grounds to take your children away from you and put them up for adoption.

Oh and those children will be needed for all the adoptions that will be wanted by couples who could not produce their own children.

Don’t kid yourself this is the MAIN objective of this legislation. The entire goal behind it is to break up the traditional family.

[PLK]

Homos are chartering busloads of people coming to Iowa to get "married." There is only a 3-day waiting period in this state, and paperwork can be filed online or via mail. There is NO residency requirement to get a marriage license in Iowa.

The punchline is there IS a residency requirement for divorce in Iowa: an ENTIRE YEAR. So . . . these people are heading back to neighboring states with marriage protection laws in the legislative code. What happens when they want to divorce? Well, their home state is not going to grant divorce if it doesn't recognize the legality of their "marriage" in the first place. If they want to get divorced in Iowa, they must move here and live for a year first.

I think this is hilarious.

[mplsconservative]

I understand what you’re saying, having lived in inner-city Minneapolis for 20 plus years. Gay moms and dads with kids were all over the place. Where we are now, it’s two parent, mom and dad families. Maybe I’m hopeful, but I don’t see the normal two parent family going away.

[Mr Rogers]

I’ll admit, I’d have loved it if Miss California’s response had been, “You want to stick what where? That is soooooooo gross! What kind of disgusting pervert are you?”

Oh well. This sort of legislation is disgusting, but it is sadder to think that it is even conceivable in America. It wouldn’t have been 30 years ago...

[Age of Reason]

The entire goal behind it is to break up the traditional family.

Too late.

They've already destroyed all valid arguments, systematically, over the last half century.

Even here most are numb to the fact that there are few if any reasons remaining for the government to marry anyone to anyone.

So now when you look around for a reason to justify your inborn hard-wired desire for traditional marriage, you cannot manage a valid argument for involving government in heterosexual marriage any more than in homosexual marriage--

Because there is no longer a reason for government to marry anyone to anyone.

And all you have left to argue with is sentiment.

Which is no objective argument.