[TheThinker]

if one party wants or would have an umbrella against all kinds of threats, this party would develop an illusion that it is allowed to do anything and then the aggressiveness of its actions will increase

But if the one party (the United States) has no reason and has never had a reason to be overly aggressive and if the other party (Russia) which has a history of aggression, (take your pick, Georgia recently) then the missile shield without preconditions is a very good and justified idea.

[pobeda1945]

“But if the one party (the United States) has no reason and has never had a reason to be overly aggressive”

Gaiana, Korea, Vietnam, Guatemala, Laos, Nikaragua, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Serbia, Afghanistan,