Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge

Coming soon to Obamacare. You’d think decisions like this would prompt a public outcry and have the bureaucrats tarred and feathered.


2 posted on 05/09/2009 9:03:21 PM PDT by Crolis (Kill your television!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Crolis
This is why the names, addresses and personal information regarding such people (those on such boards) must be made public knowledge.

We can't have a situation like we do with federal judges where their addresses are kept secret.

7 posted on 05/09/2009 9:06:31 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Crolis; lowbridge; Covenantor; Howie
The worst aspect is NOT that health care will be rationed, and many will suffer or die.

The worst aspect is that it will elevate unelected bureaucrats to a God-like status.

Ordinary people will have to grovel and beg and prostrate themselves before unelected bureaucrats, trying to get a life-saving waiver for themselves or their family members.

If the rationing and suffering was shared equally it would be bad enough.

But it won't be. Those with political connections will zip to the front of the line. Those out of favor will have their paperwork “lost.”

This gives political hacks the power of life and death over us, and will turn us into groveling beggars.

11 posted on 05/09/2009 9:12:02 PM PDT by Travis McGee ("Foreign Enemies And Traitors" is being shipped from the printer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Crolis

“Coming soon to Obamacare.”

Coming Soon? It has been here for some time now. Anyone in clinical medicine knows about the routine denial of reimbursement for Sutent which is about four grand a month. If you think private insurance is more compassionate than U.K.’s socialist NHS, you are sorely mistaken.

I can’t speak for Lapatinib because I have no data on it but I’m sure a google news of it should turn up a denial or two. Socialized medicine does not hold a monopoly on treatment denials, private insurance in the US holds its own in that department.


12 posted on 05/09/2009 9:12:43 PM PDT by jackmercer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Crolis

They soon will start giving out free cigarettes now that it has been determined to actually save health system money rather than costing the system more money.


21 posted on 05/09/2009 9:30:01 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Crolis

“You’d think decisions like this would prompt a public outcry and have the bureaucrats tarred and feathered.”

The outcry should be that the FDA, PharmaNazi’s & AMA suppress cancer cures and promote very expensive drugs that rarely succeed in ridding the patient of cancer and often kill the patient.

Many suppressed, but successful cancer treatments are available from natural sources, but lack of patentability makes them personna-non-grata in allipathic medicine because there is no money in it.

Where IS the outcry?


30 posted on 05/09/2009 10:10:17 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Crolis

Image what would happen if Hillary and her cohorts needed expensive cancer treatments.


39 posted on 05/10/2009 2:13:24 AM PDT by x_plus_one ("Salvation comes about though change in individual lives, not through the ending of unjust society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson