Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem; holdonnow

This is great law.

If they allow for the possibility that the employee can defend themselves, they are not liable.

If they prevent the employee from defending themselves, they are liable.


25 posted on 05/09/2009 3:10:23 PM PDT by fanfan (God, Bless America, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: fanfan
If they prevent the employee from defending themselves, they are liable.

And that's the way it should be. An employer's private property rights do not negate the right to life and self-defence that the employees have. Simply because someone agrees to work for you doesn't mean you have the right to put their lives in jeopardy if some nutjob comes on site and starts shooting people down.

29 posted on 05/09/2009 3:32:12 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Third Parties are for the weak, fearful, and ineffectual among us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson