Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ex 98C MI Dude
Thanks. Ironically, you get it all wrong, but your enthusiasm is impressive.

I am always fascinated when people type out vulgarities. Does it seem more mature typed than spoken?

And that you guessed that I am long-time lurker George Meany. Incredible! But, how did you know I have a tail?

But if one of your employees are hurt going to or from work in a criminal act that a weapon could have prevented, I hope the jury awards him/her both ears and the tail.

Someday I hope you get the chance to run your own business with your own money. I really do.

24 posted on 05/09/2009 2:14:54 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: 1010RD
Someday I hope you get the chance to run your own business with your own money. I really do.

Actually, MI Dude is right.

Frankly, if your negligence and infringement upon your employees' right to life and self-defence results in one or more of them being injured/killed, then you're negligence makes you (or should make you) liable because you are partly at fault.

Guess what? The right to private property doesn't give you an unlimited right to the disposition of any and all people who may happen to be on your property, especially if they're there with your permission (like employees).

31 posted on 05/09/2009 3:37:27 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Third Parties are for the weak, fearful, and ineffectual among us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson