Link to a Persian/Farsi text version at the end of the English language article.
Clear plea to USA not to abandon the oppressed people and support the bloodthirsty Mullahs
1 posted on
05/08/2009 11:29:53 PM PDT by
FARS
To: FARS
Sides are being drawn.
Guess which side 0bama will choose.
2 posted on
05/08/2009 11:32:30 PM PDT by
unkus
To: Spunky; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1035rep; 2ndDivisionVet; 4woodenboats; 5Madman2; 21stCenturyFreeThinker; ...
Text of good speech by the late Shah’s son at Irvine University May 6th
3 posted on
05/08/2009 11:32:53 PM PDT by
FARS
To: FARS
The problem with Reza is that he does not have strong leadership qualities like his father did.
To: FARS; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; BOBTHENAILER; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Therefore, my suggestion is that, far from being either self assured or strong, the kind of costly aggressive policies which the clerical regime has pursued whether in support of their surrogates in places like Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq or Afghanistan, or those which they have pursued in defiance of the UN Security Council in their dangerous search for nuclear weapons are clear manifestations of the kind of insecurity that any unpopular regime feels when it knows that is hated by a vast majority of its own people.
9 posted on
05/09/2009 12:04:06 AM PDT by
PhilDragoo
(Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
To: FARS
At least Iran didn’t have nukes when Carter gave it to the Ayatollah, Pakistan could have its nukes taken by the taliban geezs. I bet the North Koreans are send their techs over as we speak.
10 posted on
05/09/2009 12:08:32 AM PDT by
TomasUSMC
( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
To: FARS
Thanks FARS! Reza II. takes no prisoners.
11 posted on
05/09/2009 12:14:03 AM PDT by
SolidWood
(Palin: "We do not want to become slaves of Washington.")
To: nuconvert; freedom44; LibreOuMort; RaceBannon; MissDairyGoodnessVT; Cyrus the Great; sionnsar; ...
12 posted on
05/09/2009 12:15:10 AM PDT by
SolidWood
(Palin: "We do not want to become slaves of Washington.")
To: FARS
If President Obamas objective from direct engagementwith Iran is to use diplomatic channels to persuade the Iranian regime to change some of its key controversial policies such as its nuclear ambitions or its various negative regional interferences, then as we have already witnessed in recent weeks, he is in for a big surprise. In fact, it is the Iranian leadership which is calling the shots and asking for the US to change its behavior, before they sit down to talk! The true result of "dialogue without preconditions." There really are preconditions, but it's the Mullahs who establish preconditions for the U.S., while they continue with their own agenda.
Time to bring back the "duck and cover" drills.
13 posted on
05/09/2009 1:37:12 AM PDT by
Quiller
(When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
To: FARS
If President Obamas objective from direct engagementwith Iran is to use diplomatic channels to persuade the Iranian regime to change some of its key controversial policies such as its nuclear ambitions or its various negative regional interferences, then as we have already witnessed in recent weeks, he is in for a big surprise. In fact, it is the Iranian leadership which is calling the shots and asking for the US to change its behavior, before they sit down to talk! The true result of "dialogue without preconditions." There really are preconditions, but it's the Mullahs who establish preconditions for the U.S., while they continue with their own agenda.
Time to bring back the "duck and cover" drills.
(oops - mis-cued the html)
14 posted on
05/09/2009 1:39:06 AM PDT by
Quiller
(When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
To: FARS
"Clear plea to USA not to abandon the oppressed people and support the bloodthirsty Mullahs" The people overthrew the Shah.
Those same people can overthrow any Mullah or Mullahs also, when they have had enough.
Looks to me it'll have to be the people, too. O'Bummer's not going to do a thing save for taking credit for anything positive that may transpire in the region along the way. As usual.
I do know this:
Unless people PAY dearly for their liberty?
It'll never come nor will it last when it does arrive.
Oppressors have this nasty, consistent habit of never *giving* liberty away for free.
Moreover once liberty has been secured?
Holding on to liberty's harder then winning it.
What's happening here in the USDA is a piss poor example to any others around the world insofar how one holds on to hard won liberties others secured for them.
Any advise from USA's citizens on that account would be so hollow & meaningless as to be outright laughable.
Iranians et al are in the unique historic position of demonstrating to Americans that which they average American has long ago forgotten.
17 posted on
05/09/2009 8:19:24 AM PDT by
Landru
(Arghh, Liberals are trapped in my colon like spackle or paste.)
To: FARS
If President Obamas objective from direct engagementwith Iran is to use diplomatic channels to persuade the Iranian regime to change some of its key controversial policies such as its nuclear ambitions or its various negative regional interferences, then as we have already witnessed in recent weeks, he is in for a big surprise.
Bingo Reza! At least someone will call it lie it is. Pahlavi/Palin 2012!
18 posted on
05/09/2009 8:24:47 AM PDT by
G8 Diplomat
(I'm learning Arabic, Farsi, Urdu, Pashtu, and Russian so someday you won't have to)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson