OK, so you claim to know what GAs are and how they work, yet you show you really don’t based upon your reasoning above.
No use talking about GAs any more...
So answer me the question: where did Cain’s wife come from? If the Bible is historically inerrant then where did she come from?
Failing to answer that leaves the whole historical inerrancy of the Bible in question, especially about the earliest chapters.
I've made no such overt claim. I've related that I've programmed computers since 1965. I also presented the fact that the largest university in Australia called a certain program a Genetic algorithm and you can follow that link and see what they are teaching as genetic algorithms. Plus I posted a listing of another "genetic algorithm" which was cited in Scientific American.
Your Cain question has already been addressed.
Well the Bible did not mention God creating other people either - so what is your point? Did you also notice that the Bible did not spell out the years involved in the marriages and progeny produced in both chapters 4 & 5? So you simply assume no overlap is construed nor allowed.
Your arguments are baseless b/c they argue from the same assumptions that you don’t want to allow in others. Worse still for evolution to prove true you’d need assumptions an order of magnitude larger than those posed by creation while also completely ignoring any/all facts that fly in the face on long ages and macro-evolution.
Also everything about GA is mirrored most closely with intelligent design NOT evolution. Just using the terminology and trying to codify some of the ‘evolutionary’ logic does not prove anything regarding neither micro nor macro evolution.