Posted on 05/08/2009 3:06:39 PM PDT by Pantera
....
What shuts the matrix off? What is the matrix afraid of? Where is the power source of the matrix? Unplug it. Can we just infect the software? That's one option. Or can we unplug the machine so the whole thing goes... I've told you we've got to start challenging the Constitution. We have to start challenging the government. We have to start saying, "You know what, we're going to adopt a sovereignty clauses in our states." But that was to throw the matrix up against the wall and scare them. It was like I was talking last hour, the zombies: Throw them up against the wall and hold them at bay. Scare them. Thomas Jefferson said a government, where a government is afraid of its people, there is liberty. Where the people are afraid of their government, there is tyranny. So that was, let's throw them against the wall. Instead the people of Montana and the people of Texas and the people of Utah, whoa. Texas and the mountain region and now the people in Tennessee. They've all come to the same conclusion: If we challenge the government on gun laws, specifically in this one way, if we make a gun in Texas and if it's purchased in Texas this is a Montana thing. So I should probably use Montana. If it is made in Montana, purchased in Montana and remains in Montana, there is no reason the federal government should have any regulation on that gun.
...
Guns! Lots of guns!
Is Glenn the One to take on Agent Obama?
I actually got chills listening to them
Yes. It was chilling. I dont think I will be able to sleep tonight thinking of those ladies and their safety.
Thank you for your support.
I think he’s trying to get the younger people to connect “the Matrix” to our govt.The Matrix goals are closely resembling our govt.
Read Rhenquist’s opinion in US v Lopez No. 93-1260, (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995) clarifying the boundaries of the application of the Interstate Commerce Clause: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1260.ZO.html
bump
Yes. It was California. Liberal judges on the Supreme Court upheld the Feds, citing interstate commerce clause. Justice Thomas and other conservative judges dissented. Thomas wrote great opinion pretty much saying that if you would use the interstate commerce clause then it could be applied to virtually anything. Since this was about pot, it really shows that for the libs it really is all about more power. They'll interpret the constitution in the most tortuous way possible to take power away from the states and the people.
“Glenn- I worry about him”
As well as I.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.