Skip to comments.
White House Is Firm on Shaking Up Military Spending
NY Times ^
| May 6, 2009
| Christopher Drew
Posted on 05/06/2009 5:50:00 PM PDT by jazusamo
When the Obama administration outlined its plans to cut big weapons programs, some of the military industrys allies in Congress assumed, as they have in the past, that they would have the final say.
But over the last week, the White House has prodded Congressional leaders to strip several billion dollars worth of extra equipment out of a wartime spending bill.
Experts say that effort suggests Mr. Obama should be able to reshape the Pentagons spending practices.
The developments have shaken up the industry. In the past, military contractors have routinely beaten back attempts to cancel weapons programs by lobbying Congress. But Mr. Obamas popularity and the financial crisis are changing this well-choreographed dance. The White House is trying to demonstrate that when the president says no, he means it.
Its the best possible moment politically to exercise this kind of budget discipline, said Gordon Adams, a professor at American University in Washington who closely monitors military spending.
Even Democratic Congressional leaders who want to protect defense jobs are falling in line. They are saying, Lets not go too far, Mr. Adams said.
The White House has not blocked everything that Congress wanted to add to the supplemental war-spending bill, which is expected to be approved by the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday. And Congress will have another chance to reverse some of the cuts when it considers the administrations budget for the 2010 fiscal year, also expected to be released Thursday.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; bhodod; defense; defensespending; dodbudget; federalspending; mccain; mccainlevin; mccaintruthfile; mctraitor; murtha; obama; second100days
1
posted on
05/06/2009 5:50:00 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
...just the NYT letting the terrorist know we’re cutting military spending
2
posted on
05/06/2009 5:51:44 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: jazusamo
Budget discipline? Budget discipline from this Administration? Budget discipline my a$$.
To: Doogle
Yep, but they could have written this right after he was elected cuz everyone knew Obambi was going to do it.
4
posted on
05/06/2009 5:55:15 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Even Democratic Congressional leaders who want to protect defense jobs are falling in line.
Hopefully to their peril in the next election cycle. Could be some opportunities for the Pubs.
5
posted on
05/06/2009 5:55:35 PM PDT
by
microgood
To: jazusamo
6
posted on
05/06/2009 6:01:03 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: jazusamo
The White House is trying to demonstrate that when the president says no, he means it.
Only when it comes to spending that actually helps keep us secure.
7
posted on
05/06/2009 6:19:31 PM PDT
by
rbg81
(DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
To: jazusamo
$3.73 Trillion and all but one department grows fat and happy. But the Marxists have always hated the military and now the military will pay the price. This should surprise no one.
8
posted on
05/06/2009 6:21:24 PM PDT
by
Bulldawg Fan
(Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
To: jazusamo
Defense? Jobs? Defense jobs? We don’t need no stinkin’ defense jobs!
9
posted on
05/06/2009 6:21:33 PM PDT
by
OpeEdMunkey
(We seem to have reached a critical mass of stupid people.)
To: jazusamo
I’d like to see zero based budgets tried for awhile and see what the outcome would be under them.
10
posted on
05/06/2009 6:25:05 PM PDT
by
deport
To: centurion316
Yes they do for the military which he despises but some where increases for arts and diversity training will equal the military cuts
11
posted on
05/06/2009 6:36:04 PM PDT
by
italianquaker
(We went from a country that hates the president to a president that hates his country)
To: jazusamo
Yes? I think Drudge got it right earlier.
Obama plans to make large cuts in weapons systems, but also plans to add 20,000 new weapons procurement bureaucrats.
That sure makes a lot of sense—if you want more government and less defense.
I presume it also means that the government bureaucrats will be more firmly in control of distributing the pork.
12
posted on
05/06/2009 6:42:27 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
Ever get a gut feeling the HNIC knows he's a one term wonder? He's just too eager to flip us all the bird for no good reason, even the few not America hating dems in Congress, much to his long-term peril. With all the daily WOW subterfuge, and with most everyone focused on the latest unbelievable "dare you", it seems his crew is stealing everything they can before the $hit starts to hit the fan.
13
posted on
05/06/2009 7:39:17 PM PDT
by
dusttoyou
(Remember the Alamo - CHENEY-PALIN 2012)
To: jazusamo
The left intends to destroy our military.
14
posted on
05/06/2009 7:41:38 PM PDT
by
snowsislander
(NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
To: Bulldawg Fan
How can these A$$E$ do this to our MILITARY???!! They HATE everything about the U.S. military, but whoaaaaa -- It's freakin' ok to let terrorists go free, while this Jackass President in Thief steals from DEFENSE coffers and gives it to his minions! I am SICK SICK SICK of this SOB!
To: snowsislander
No doubt in my mind that you’re right and as the moonbat left gets stronger the worse it gets for our military.
16
posted on
05/06/2009 7:55:26 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: Dick Bachert; 50mm; stockpirate; Eaker; ducdriver; ChrisInAR; AvOrdVet; MaggieCarta; indylindy; ...
The Senate on Wednesday began considering a bill to strengthen the Pentagons contracting process. One of its chief sponsors, Senator John McCain of Arizona, who was Mr. Obamas Republican rival in the presidential race last year, strongly supports many of the changes that Mr. Obama wants to make. |
|
The Juan McCain Truth File. "I have great respect for Al Gore." John McCain, October 2, 2008 FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords. This can be a very high-volume ping list at times. To join the ping list: FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add mccaintruthfile. (Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.) Republican Commissars Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless RNC shills who simply want to meet a new overlord. |
|
17
posted on
05/06/2009 8:23:11 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
Banana republics don't have a strong well equipped military to safe guard their citizens.
They do have an army to control the uprisings by the peons.
18
posted on
05/06/2009 8:39:25 PM PDT
by
TYVets
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson