I think this headline is taken completely out of context. And, it’s a no-win situation. If Sessions said, “Absolutely not,” they would have tarred and feathered him. He said he would consider a homosexual justice, not vote for him
Big difference
There’s no way a gay supreme could be impartial.
“If Sessions said, ‘Absolutely not,’ they [the liberal media] would have tarred and feathered him.”
... and that’s a bad thing? I’m proud of being considered a ‘homophobe’ by the Leftist militants.
I totally agree with you.
““I’m not inclined to think that’s an automatic disqualification,” Sessions said of a gay nominee. He said he intends to consider only the nominee’s legal judgment when deciding his support for Justice David Souter’s proposed replacement.”
The democrats are trying to divide us and they are doing a great job doing it. Sessions gave a very wise answer.