Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alstewartfan
Evolution is a scientific term and it has been clearly defined by science.

Rush did not quibble when he said he believed in evolution.

How do you KNOW that Rush rejects something that you cannot even describe properly. Cross species evolution? Do you mean speciation?

26 posted on 05/14/2009 1:03:10 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
#23 of Rush's original “35 Undeniable Truths of Life” stated that “Evolution cannot explain creation.” I've heard him in years past say that he disbelieves in cross-species evolution.
Now, if he has subsequently changed his mind, that would be unfortunate. To take a single cell, the naturalistic probability of which is zero, and imagine that within that miracle cell, there was contained therein the gazillions of bits of information to mutate into the millions of fully functional organisms we witness today, is fantastical and absurd. So, I'd be stunned if Rush does believe it now. Blessings, Bob
27 posted on 05/15/2009 8:56:06 PM PDT by alstewartfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson