[Hostage]

$98 is LESS THAN 2x the rebate of $196 a month, is it not?

Did you not say “ a person making LESS THAN 2x the rebate”?

Ok, so say its $196 x 2 - $1 = $391.

Who Filo can live off of $391 a month? Who?

A dependent or a bum Filo.

And a dependent will not be collecting a rebate. The head of their household will collect it.

So that leaves bums only.

In either case your argument is that the FairTax Rebate is a massive wealth distribution scheme because bums will collect a rebate check of $196 a month.

Amd how many bums are there do you estimate Filo?

How many?

[Filo]

In either case your argument is that the FairTax Rebate is a massive wealth distribution scheme because bums will collect a rebate check of $196 a month.

Amd how many bums are there do you estimate Filo?

Again, dimwit, if it's just one then the program is a wealth redistribution program and is, thus, unconstitutional.

In reality there will be millions, and not just bums.

Meanwhile, I'm done with your particular brand of stupidity. You are completely incapable of getting even the simplest of points and you are far more dishonest than even the FT legislation.

Since you haven't yet added a single thing of value to this discussion I feel safe in assuming that trend will continue after I stop reading your blather.

Go forth and multiply.

[lewislynn]

Who Filo can live off of $391 a month? Who?

Where is it written it's not an entitlement if you can't live off of it.

Every example given from your own Fairtax calculator shows more "spendable income" than gross income earned...What do you call that exactly? And where exactly does that extra "spendable income" come from? The Obama money tree?

How does a rebate increase your spendale gross without taking it from someone else? Answer that one Hostage.