Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lafroste

Okay, let’s take a simpler situation lacking relativistic speeds. Mass can be observed to be lost in its own reference frame, say, when deuterium-tritium fusion takes place. There’s a certain amount of mass beforehand, and measurably less after the fusion takes place. Thus, mass is not conserved. I expect you’ll have a tough time reconciling your theory with this.


105 posted on 05/07/2009 3:23:04 PM PDT by aNYCguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: aNYCguy
Thus, mass is not conserved. I expect you’ll have a tough time reconciling your theory with this.

Actually, not really. My theory also claims that mass and energy are different facets of the same thing (steam and ice). Any mechanical machination to inter convert them is fine with me.

107 posted on 05/07/2009 5:05:09 PM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson