Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Links to three DOJ Press releases:

Juvenile Arrested in Bomb Threat - March 6, 2009

The United States Attorney's Office announced that late yesterday evening, a juvenile was arrested pursuant to a federal warrant. The arrest stems from a false bomb threat directed to Purdue University on February 15 and similar threats directed to schools.

Juvenile Information Filed - May 7, 2009

... the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana wishes to further announce that a juvenile information has been filed and is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. That charge alleges a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 844(e) ...

The government has filed a motion with the Court seeking to transfer the juvenile to adult status for prosecution pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 5032; that motion is pending before the Court and is scheduled for a hearing during the month of May.

Federal Grand Jury Returns Indictment - July 8, 2009

Lundeby, 16, of Oxford, N.C., was arrested by the FBI at his home in Oxford on March 6, 2009. A federal search warrant was also executed at that time. Lundeby was arrested pursuant to a juvenile criminal complaint filed in the Northern District of Indiana. ...

The U.S. Attorney’s Office filed a motion seeking to proceed against Lundeby as if he were an adult. The U.S. District Court in South Bend granted that motion and this indictment followed.

Lundeby must have agreed to waive the 30 day statutory timeline that pertains to "detention/trial" for a juvenile.

Putting the March and July releases together, one is invited to conclude that the arrest in March was pursuant to a criminal complaint, effectively a charging document. In other words, that he wasn't held without charge.

Now that he's been charged as an adult, fully named, etc., there is no privacy interest to protect in the earlier juvenile proceedings. His mother should move to obtain them (if she can't get them by simply paying the fee for obtaining copies), and if she won't, perhaps one of the interested press outlets (e.g., "Wired.com") will move to unseal the government formal charges, motions, etc. and his counsel's formal responses.

96 posted on 07/10/2009 6:29:34 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt; piasa
Cboldt, thanks for your research.

Re #95: Yes, there was a month-and-a-half delay between the juvenile-to-adult transfer hearing and the issuance of the grand jury indictment. Considering how much information the grand jury must have had to work with (20 separate incidents), they moved faster than I would have expected.

Paragraph 39 cites prank calls (not bomb threat hoaxes) on March 4 -- two days before the Lundeby arrest. Could these calls have precipitated the arrest? Can you please excerpt Paragraph 39 for us?

Another thread on this topic was started today. I'll post a link to this thread on the new one.

97 posted on 07/10/2009 9:37:58 PM PDT by normanpubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson