Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
The search warrant is shown at 3:00 into the WRAL-TV video clearly indicating the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Lundeby home address, and the date of service as March 5.

I agree -- let's end the thread pending further developments. Thanks for the interesting and informative discussion.
88 posted on 05/10/2009 8:52:48 PM PDT by normanpubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: normanpubbie
News is still sketchy. Nothing new shows up at google, using the search terms "Ashton" "Lundeby". I did get more recent information using "teen" "bomb" "threat" "purdue" "indiana".

Mom Loses Bid for Purdue Bomb Hoax Suspect's Freedom by Kevin Poulsen [Wired] - June 3, 2009, which links to a few earlier articles. One of the earlier ones, Mother of Purdue Bomb Hoax Suspect Sues for Son's Release (May 27, 2009) includes a link to a petition for habeas, filed by Mrs. Lundeby. http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2009/05/annette_lundeby_filing.pdf.

The filing is pro se, and it shows. Case No. 3:09-cv-00234-RL, titled as being filed in the Northern District of Illinois, South Bend Division. LOL. This case No. is NOT the same case No. as would contain an indictment or complaint against Ashton - Mrs. Lundeby's habeas filing is Doc. No. 1 in 3:09-cv-00234-RL

Her legal theories are BS, and the pleading is borderline insane; but she says she does not have any notice of the charges, and that she did not consent to the appointment of counsel for her son. She also claims that the voice on the bomb threat to Purdue is not her son's voice (which would mean it doesn't sound like "Tyrone's" voice either - the recorded calls that were available on the internet were in "Tyrone's" voice and were threats to schools in states other than Indiana)

Therefore, taking this back down to the ground, Next Friend demands proof (1) that the U.S. is, in fact, insolvent, (2) that the USOA is, in fact, an authorized representative of this insolvency estate, and (3) that USOA is, in fact, a "foreign" entity for which doj would have signature authority at all.

The June 3 article includes some quotes from the Court's response. I may obtain the entire response to see if it contains useful information.

A.L.[the teen] may raise challenges to his pretrial confinement and the sufficiency of the indictment as well as jurisdictional and due process concerns in the pending pretrial proceedings and, if desired, on appeal ... A.L. already has challenged his pretrial detention unsuccessfully and may take an interlocutory appeal of his pretrial detention. ... Mrs. Lundeby hasn't identified any nonfrivolous basis for pursuing habeas relief in advance of trial.

89 posted on 06/11/2009 9:15:55 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson