[jla]

Knowing it's not my place to do so I'll do say anyway and advise that you cease from responding to the farmer, (who would have served himself better, and more accurately,by dubbing himself the 'grim reaper').
I am disposed to think, and agree with others here, that he's a lib, just here to wreak a bit of havoc. Though of course I've no way of ascertaining that.
Regardless, your posts on this topic have been nothing but exemplary. And I will add, you always impress by making your point strongly, without abandoning your femininity.

[Victoria Delsoul]

Thanks for the advice, JLA, and for those nice comments. I appreciate it.

I just came back from a late tennis match. It took all the afternoon, but I feel good that I beat my opponent. I usually beat older guys, but guys my age usually beat me, LOL. Today I beat an opponent about my age, and I realize, hey, all it took was more concentration and reading his mind. In other words, figuring out what he is going to do before he does it. My friends and I went out for pizza and chicken wings afterward, so I feel good.

No, I have no intention of feeding the sexual appetite of a mental case. His obsession with Sarah Palin focuses on the sexual exploits he concocts and the blame he places on her for her daughter's situation, as if Sarah had committed the act.  He punctuates his accounts with  curses and condemnations.  He views Sarah as a sexual object, as he only sees her big boobs and good makeup instead of policies, as he has repeatedly pointed out.

If I were FR's owner, I would've banned him a long time ago based on his posting history, complete with the sexual connotations, innuendos, and perverted arguments that have nothing to do with Palin the politician.  His post history reveals that he is most likely a liberal and a woman hater, and he would be better off posting on a liberal site, where he would be in agreement with those who continuously hate and trash our best conservative and pro life candidates.  He is a poster who chronically has a reading comprehension problem.  Nobody here is suggesting that Bristol's situation is good or optimal, as I and many others have explained to him. I don't know why he retreats to that fantasy, except that it gives him a reason to springboard into his rote criticisms.

Now, Bristol is saying that abstinence is a good strategy, but that's still not good enough for him because he has much more fun with his floating standards of conduct and expectations.  The fact is, he will never be satisfied and will always find something to be critical about.

We know where he stands - the thing is, he stands pretty much alone. And that's a good thing. Most people around here, after all, aren't sympathetic to his position on this matter. That's a good thing again, and he remains relatively alone clinging to his fixed position. Posters like him give FR a bad name.