Thanks for demonstrating my point. It's you who is fixated with sexual themes, imagery and related fetishes. Whenever the Palin story shows up on FR, you chronically inject yourself into the debate, dwelling on the sexual aspect of the story and obsessing over the sexual morality of the whole episode.
Nobody says that Bristol's situation is optimal. Nobody is suggesting that it is even a particularly good situation. But you continue, curling up into the fetal position and foaming at the mouth, making your case that everything about this story is wrong. What a strange, strange world view.
So Farmer, you want me to crack open a book? I'm not the one fixated on sex and big boobs - those thoughts are peripheral and totally irrelevant to the subject at hand.
And another thing, I don't idolize anyone but God. But how would you know? You are too busy using your “brainpower” to visualize the sizes of Sarah and Bristol's boobs.
This thread is about the way a possible presidential candidate handles both her own family problems and what effect the behavior of her children may have upon the way she formulates policy. (We already know, for example, that a "gay" child had the effect of encouraging Dick Cheney to endorse same-sex marriage.) You made our exchange into a "sex" thread by writing this line:
Like I said, you never miss a Palin thread that involves sex - that really shows what’s on your mind
That's exactly the way diseased sodomites stop any reference to their degenerate acts, by accusing their detractors of being sex-obsessed.
You are a joke--on more fronts than one--so I respond to swine as swine deserve. A cursory glance at your posts indicate pretty much your sum total. You would be much more becoming serving punch to the neighborhood kids.