beyond the reach of a juror?????? guess the common man is not good enough to make a choice on right or wrong??? the common man cannot figure how to judge someone using the concept of inalienable Rights????
so why is the common man not able to use this power correctly, yet you assume judges in black robes can use this power correctly???
why are you so aginst the common man acting on his beliefs of inalienable rights, or on his belief that teh law is wrong???
why do you hold judges so high, and common man so low, are judges better than the rest of us??? why even bother with a jury in that case????
I am reminded of those who oppose the death penalty yet get on juries who decide cases that could lead to that penalty. Because they disagree with the death penalty they will hang a jury and cause a retrial of obviously guilty people.
Don’t assume that all people who do and will use your approach are those who agree with you. Some are your enemies.