Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TChris

well if your idea of fixing the problem of bad law, will allow a man to rot in jail waiting for the legislature to fix the probelm, well let me just state i hope that unfortunate person is you, not anyone else.
that is a selfish, immoral, anti-patriotic postion to take. for you to allow a freeman to be imprisoned for a law you KNOW is wrong, just becuase you have some high headed belief that the legal system will eventualy fix itself, and you must wait for that process is dead wrong.

the jury is to not convict an innocent man. a man is not guilty of violating unjust laws. you would rather convict a man to prison than vote to free that man, just becuase you think the law should be fixed by someone else. that is sick and is of the same mind set that allowed law abiding germans to ignore the rounding up of the jews by hitler. just wait until it is your problem

for some reason, I bet you would not want to be in prison for an un-just law. I bet you would not want to wait for our failed legislature, and revisionist judges to fix the problem.

you are not fit to serve on anyting but a Stalinist kangoroo court “jury”.


61 posted on 05/12/2009 10:11:14 AM PDT by dhm914
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: dhm914
I bet you would not want to wait for our failed legislature, and revisionist judges to fix the problem.

Why worry about revisionist judges when you can have revisionist juries?

I think we've both made our respective positions abundantly clear on this. I'll wish you a good day and leave it to those reading the thread to decide for themselves.

62 posted on 05/12/2009 10:16:51 AM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson