Read it again.
Is she FOR or AGAINST comprehensive immigration reform?
case closed.
You keep posting snippets of articles out of context. On another thread, you are insinuating she supports Obama's bailouts, again with nothing to back it up - you either can't or won't bring yourself to perform some due diligence on a woman you are obsessed with. Too bad you couldn't have used some of that energy to pull your hands out from under your butt during the election.
Here's a snippet of a 12.22.2008 interview with Human Events on the stimulus packages as the NWO events were unfolding; http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=29994
GIZZI: In campaigning for Sen. Chambliss, you brought back a lot of conservatives who had been critical of him for voting for the Wall Street bailout [of financial institutions]. Would you have favored the Wall Street bailout and voted as Sen. Chambliss did?
PALIN: I would have done what the GOP [senators] did yesterday and said no to additional bailout efforts of one industry [the automobile industry, whose proposed federal bailout was stopped in the Senate December 11]. Picking winners and losers in Washington, D.C., is a dangerous thing to do when youre talking about a system that supposed to be based on free enterprise. When you talk about rewarding for work ethic and good management decisions and then consequences are the results of the opposite of that, and those decisions lead to some mistakes that are made in some industries, taxpayer bailouts should not be looked to as the be-all, end-all solutions.
But back then, weeks ago, when that initial bailout [of financial institutions] was proposed, remember, it was considered at the time a rescue and not necessarily a bailout. Without having as much information as everyone has now, I did support that initial effort that was going to come from Congress. Of course, we saw [Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben] Bernanke and others appear to change the rules right away, it seemed like, after that initial rescue plan or bailout was given the green light, then everybody in the public, including me, started hearing that the rules were changing on where those dollars would go and what the criterion would be. Unfortunately, that leads to distrust of decisions our politicians make on our behalf and bureaucrats make on our behalf.
Now the situation has changed, and I think the GOP did the right thing yesterday in saying, Look, we still want more information before one industry -- in this case, the auto industry -- gets more taxpayer assistance until everybody knows what those dollars would be used for and how it will lead to success in this industry.
GIZZI: So you stand with Sen. [Bob] Corker [Tenn.] and other Republicans who stopped the auto industry bailout in the Senate?
PALIN: I do. Once bitten, twice shy. We learned a lesson, at least being amenable -- if not enthused -- to the idea all those weeks ago to the first rescue plan. But then the rules changed quickly, and more information was revealed that perhaps Congress and the bureaucrats in the Treasury Department not having a good grasp on what the problem was and how taxpayer funds would solve any of the problems. Thats caused a lot of concern and caution on my part and the part of the Republican Party.
GIZZI: Indiana Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels has spoken out against the bailout of states that [California] Gov. [Arnold] Schwarzenegger and other governors have called for. As a governor yourself and an active member of the National Governors Association, where do you stand on the bailout of states?
PALIN: Every state, like every community in the United States, comes to Congress with its list of infrastructure needs. Alaska is going to join every other state with a governors list. In fact, Ive looked at every other governors list of infrastructure needs thats presented to Congress. Its up to Congress, because Congress holds the purse strings, to decide how some of those projects are going to be funded. Alaskas projects are going to be in the nations best interests. They will be infrastructure that will build gas lines and build that infrastructure up that will lead to energy production to allow us to become energy independent. We arent asking for things like Bridges to Nowhere.
But, in speaking with Gov. Schwarzenegger about this, he has said its not his intention to ask for a bailout that is based on his states management decisions that have led to some problems in that state. In Alaska, were fortunate. We have a surplus. We have money put aside for the last few years, waiting for a rainy day when the economy wasnt as strong. We are in a good position, so we are not asking for, nor should we ask for, a bailout from the feds. But we will, along with every other state, have our list of infrastructure projects and roads and very basic tools that will lead to energy production.
Why not try on a new tagline to the effect of Governor Palin has managed to maintain a SURPLUS, LOW TAXES, AND A FRACTION OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF PEOPLE THAN MOST BIG CITIES HAVE ILLEGAL ALIENS, BUT I STILL HATE HER AND I DON'T VOTE.
At least that'd be honest.