Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CurlyDave

Unkowning incest then. Your “point” is still pointless. Judah’s act was not endorsed by God, simply because Jesus was among his progeny, any more than David’s act of adultery was endorsed by God because Jesus was a son of David. You’re going to have to work very hard to turn fornication into a biblical virtue. Now, as Wood says, let’s get back to the thread.


129 posted on 05/05/2009 12:27:09 AM PDT by farmer18th (If you preach "too big to let fail," you're also preaching "too small to let succeed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: farmer18th
Unkowning incest then. Your “point” is still pointless. Judah’s act was not endorsed by God, simply because Jesus was among his progeny, any more than David’s act of adultery was endorsed by God because Jesus was a son of David. You’re going to have to work very hard to turn fornication into a biblical virtue.

Still having trouble with those black words on the white page aren't we?

You are one of the reasons many Americans turn away from Christians. No one has ever claimed Judah's act was "endorsed" by God. I said "forgiven", a concept clearly alien to your thoughts.

142 posted on 05/05/2009 12:40:59 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson