Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Of Course There's Going To Be A Newspaper Bailout (NYT, WPO)
the business insider ^

Posted on 05/04/2009 8:52:54 PM PDT by FromLori

News that the Boston Globe could shutter its doors any day now, leaving the city without its most famous paper, prompted some reporter to ask White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs whether there would be a bailout for the newspaper industry. Gibbs said no: "I don’t know what, in all honesty, government can do about it.” But then he added that, "(Obama) believes there has to be a strong free press" and that the President has expressed "concern and sadness" over the state of the industry.

Ding-Ding-Ding.

Folks, a newspaper bailout is coming. Maybe not in time to save the Boston Globe, but certainly in time to save "systemically important" papers like The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune and the LA Times.

First it starts with the president expressing "concern and sadness." Then that's followed up by a series of columnists and pundits talking about how the lack of a thriving fourth estate posed "systemic risk" to democracy.

A free and informed press with the resources to criticize business and government is especially important during this crisis, they'll say. Internet journalism, we'll be told, is a positive development, but alas there are too many people not online -- particularly the poor, the most vulnerable in society -- so a digital only press can not suffice.

Next we'll be told that the economic crisis is an extraordinary black swan. The economic crisis is not the newspapers' fault, they'll say (they played by the rules!) and had there been no crisis, then newspapers would've had the time to develop a sustainable digital-based business model. Alas, the economic crisis circumvented what would've been a smooth transition.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; bailouts; enemedia; justsayno; morebailouts; newspapers; nyt; wp

1 posted on 05/04/2009 8:52:54 PM PDT by FromLori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FromLori

If the US Government bails out the newspapers, then we need to take up arms.


2 posted on 05/04/2009 9:00:00 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Somebody stole my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

We may think things are greatnow but ultimately, there will be a consolidation with only a few controlling vast swaths of information.


3 posted on 05/04/2009 9:03:47 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I expect to see some kind of relief program for the major newspapers. WaPo, NYT, LAT, ect., are primary propaganda organs for the Left and their communist allies in the U.S. (much like the ACLU in legal matters). BHO and the Dem Congress are not going to let them die.


4 posted on 05/04/2009 9:06:33 PM PDT by Comparative Advantage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

This may have been the whole point of this clearly induced financial meltdown:
Govt bails out failed automaker, ends up owning a big piece of it, nobody complains.
Next step, govt bails out failed newspaper, ends up owning most of it, decides to appoint a “responsible manager” to run it.

Someone like Rahm Emanuel...


5 posted on 05/04/2009 9:09:48 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Rush could buy the New York Times, and probably make it work.


6 posted on 05/04/2009 9:11:49 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Government would have been bailing out buggy-whip manufacturers if Zero’d been running things in the ‘30s...


7 posted on 05/04/2009 9:12:19 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If the US Government bails out the newspapers, then we need to take up arms.

Good luck with that. It is a certainty, the libs have to keep the dumbed down population up to date on how to vote. Maybe they could use some of the billions in taxpayer funds that ACORN got. We are sooooo screwed.
8 posted on 05/04/2009 9:13:25 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

There are newspapers and there are newspapers. Some are actually doing well (local papers, the WSJ)

The deceitful democrat party propaganda outlets are failing big time as readers vote with their feet.


9 posted on 05/04/2009 9:14:13 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Chains you can believe in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
"Rush could buy the New York Times, and probably make it work."

But he won't because he knows it can't.

10 posted on 05/04/2009 9:14:26 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Scary. Again....Obuma is everything that the loony left said that Bush might be.
11 posted on 05/04/2009 9:15:59 PM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301
We may think things are greatnow but ultimately, there will be a consolidation with only a few controlling vast swaths of information.

Oh I am sure that Soros has a grand strategy and things are progressing quite nicely for him.
12 posted on 05/04/2009 9:16:23 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fso301
We may think things are greatnow but ultimately, there will be a consolidation with only a few controlling vast swaths of information.

News Corp, Hearst, McClatchy, Scripps-Howard, Cox.

Wouldn't that be "only a few controlling vast swaths of information"?

13 posted on 05/04/2009 9:16:54 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Just as the ‘Rats are asking for 94.2 billion in emergency cash. Coincidence? I think NOT


14 posted on 05/04/2009 9:34:00 PM PDT by submarinerswife ("If I win I can't 't be stopped! If I lose I shall be dead." - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Even if they bailed out newspapers, what will change other than the fact that money will be wasted? Those who don’t read newspapers now still won’t read them. I don’t even buy or read my local rag, not even on their website. The next step for Obamalini is to control the Internet and ban talk radio. So I really don’t think there’ll be a bailout of newspapers because nothing will change.


15 posted on 05/04/2009 9:44:13 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
So I really don’t think there’ll be a bailout of newspapers because nothing will change.

Without the New York Times, how in hell will the evening network newscasts know what to report? And in what order?

16 posted on 05/04/2009 9:53:03 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Why not just rename those big 4 as:

Pravda East, Pravda West, Pravda North & Pravda South

17 posted on 05/04/2009 10:06:02 PM PDT by cliff630
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
"(Obama) believes there has to be a strong free press"

Free as in freedom? Ha, of course not. Free as in "It's free because the Government will pay for everything!"

18 posted on 05/04/2009 10:21:24 PM PDT by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Comparative Advantage

Any bailouts for conservative newspapers?


19 posted on 05/04/2009 10:25:56 PM PDT by Aroostook25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Wouldn't that be "only a few controlling vast swaths of information"?

Yes and those that remain will have even greater control

20 posted on 05/05/2009 7:08:31 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson