[editor-surveyor]

"My problem with this is not what they say, but the base manipulation of facts inherent in some of the things said."

No, your problem is that you wish us to buy your strawman rant.

Nothing that you present is valid, because it has all been discussed, and well answered hundreds of times. We are not here to reinvent the wheel for the thousandth time.

Fish fossils are on mountain tops because the Genesis judgement killed them in massive quantities, and the subsequent upheaval of the Earth's crust created mountains out of what had been the bottom of the original shallow ocean. The fact that the upheaval is still somewhat in motion is in no way a detriment to what the subject article states, and I cannot see how you expect to twist it to be so.

Just where is this alleged "manipulation?"

All that you mention is strong evidence in support of the Genesis judgement.

[sitetest]

Dear editor-surveyor,

Is this a ping list to which you've pinged me? Which one? Just how did I get on it?

Thanks,

sitetest

[tacticalogic]

So the continental drift and subsequent creation of the mountain ranges came after the flood and the killing and fossilization of all the plants and animals?

[ciwwaf]

“and the subsequent upheaval of the Earth’s crust”

Please answer all of the following questions. As we are too ignorant to see the answers.

What caused the upheaval of Earth’s Crust?

When do YOU believe this flood occured?

How do you explain lasting man made structures in China and Egypt with no evidence of flood water?

Where did the water go?

If you answered God made it dissapear to the previous question, then can your arguement really stand up to scientific analysis? If it can’t, then why bother with science, geology, astronomy? Why not keep religion where it belongs (in churches and in our day to day lifes...not geology)

here is a question that you might want to think about

Is there any possible way that your search for biblical evidence is due to a lack of faith?