Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ejonesie22
He is not a proponent of socialized medicine much less a creator of such a plan.

What do you call his Federal Free Pill Program? Hardly a free market idea.

875 posted on 05/04/2009 6:27:15 AM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]


To: Zevonismymuse
A mistake, but not nearly as big as one as Mitt's universal plan. Bush's plan was at least limited to seniors already in a government run system. not ideal, and not very successful but it hardly had the impact that Romneycare would have if it went nation wide as well, especially with its fines and mandates

Bush made many mistakes, and those have been alluded to and discussed here on FR from the top down. But on fundamentals (life, guns, God, etc.)he was and has been consistent.

Now how logical would it be that if Bush, whom we trusted to at least some extent, let us down in some areas that we in turn then move our support to a man who has PROVEN to be untrustworthy on not just the fundamentals, but on such issues as universal health care as well.

I understand what parallels you are trying to draw and why, but it is the ultimate non-sequitir really, apples and oranges. Mitt has a record the lets us know we can't trust him BEFORE we even give him a shot. If Bush had the same record leading into 2000 he would have never gotten the nod from conservatives.

Keep swinging, this is fun...

882 posted on 05/04/2009 7:01:07 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson