Oh, blah, blah, blah. Go ahead and wrap yourself in the flag. Political freedom means one can disagree on politics. One can even decide, without any evidence and in lieu of backing up your political judgment with facts, that your opponent is a “worthless POS.” But that’s a stupid way to arrive at political judgments, and a stupid way to argue.
And, in a free country, one can point out that stupidity.
Disagreement is one part of political freedom, another is the responsibility to the goals and ideals the nation is based on.
You point blank told another American that they are not significant enough to pass judgment on one so accomplished as Romney.
Yet over 200 years ago, in many cases the “rednecks” of the day passed judgment on the most royal of royalty....
And you still don't get it, you don't get how elitist that very simple sentence and the concept that backs it is.
Until you do, you are only furthering the case against Mitt, not for him.
Elitism is for the left.