Skip to comments.
Unlike Romney's "National Council for a New America," Free Republic is a conservative site!
Refer to Romney's Council for a New American Socialist State formed in HIS Image ^
| May 2, 2009
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 05/03/2009 12:32:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,441-1,449 next last
To: library user; Protest
Reread what Protest said. Protest was referring to a place where he/she (Protest) could sometimes make sense.
61
posted on
05/03/2009 12:51:51 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
No, because, thankfully it still IS a free Republic.
To: Jim Robinson
Amen! And might I add “Political Correctness” to the list.
63
posted on
05/03/2009 12:52:29 PM PDT
by
BnBlFlag
(Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
To: Jim Robinson
Free Republic is a conservative site Hell yeah! Let's have some Roast RINO for supper.
64
posted on
05/03/2009 12:52:59 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve)
To: Petronski
If you are paid to do a job, you do that job.
“Team Mitt Inc.” bloggers are paid to “pretend” to be one of us and spread the Romney “Myth”...
They will not go anymore willingly than anyone else who loves their job...
65
posted on
05/03/2009 12:53:27 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: Blue Highway
66
posted on
05/03/2009 12:55:06 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: Jim Robinson
Lindsay Graham? I guess I will agree with you just on the basis of his membership in the “Gang of 14” and support of Bank Nationalization(socialism) but he is redeemable he did support Clinton’s impeachment and put his blood and sweat into it, right?
Anyway we will never have the level of conservative policies we desire until we have a larger change in the media. Isn’t obvious they were the larges factor in Obomanations election? Could also use some party discipline where party members could vote to kick people out of the party so as to maintain the purity of our brand and image, no?
67
posted on
05/03/2009 12:55:19 PM PDT
by
steve0
(My plan B: christianexodus.org/)
To: Petronski
In other words, I think they’re far less likely to merely take their ball and go home of their own accord. Then they need to be shown the door.
68
posted on
05/03/2009 12:55:40 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Jim Robinson
FR is like good single malt Scots Whisky
-It’s complex
-It’s strong...often too strong for some!
-It’s misunderstood and feared by the easily-swayed
-It’s absolutely hated by some...and those individuals are determined to force others to share their opinion via large and small attacks on free speech and freedom of choice.
You’re right...it’s not for everyone!
To: Jim Robinson
As a governor, Mitt left behind for his state, an appalling legacy of the most aggressive and egregious gay rights legislation in the country. School programs openly advocate the gay lifestyle in lurid detail at all levels. The state government has installed various gay activists in high level positions to further the homosexual agenda in all walks of life.
... The governor had nothing to do with these thing? Really!? People just don't seem to get it about Mitt. I don't know why.
70
posted on
05/03/2009 12:56:03 PM PDT
by
auntyfemenist
(Fetch the royal iPod..)
To: wagglebee
Ronaldus Maximus. He went his own way, which happened to be the way my parents raised me.
71
posted on
05/03/2009 12:56:22 PM PDT
by
jimtorr
To: Jim Robinson
Thanks Jim!
72
posted on
05/03/2009 12:56:44 PM PDT
by
gidget7
(Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
To: library user
Romney is a slick opportunist. He is better than, say, McCain, who is driven by a genuine commitment to liberalism in many areas. Romney will be conservative if it is in his advantage to be conservative - a semi-reliable opportunist, if you will.
That, however, does not make him worthy of active FR support. Someone has to guard the non-RINO core values, after all...
To: Jim Robinson
Sadly, you have to explain this at least once every year it seems.
Keep up the great work, and thank you for this conservative bastion in an increasingly leftist liberal world!
74
posted on
05/03/2009 12:57:06 PM PDT
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: ejonesie22
Thank God the fight with the "MITTENS" has been won (on FR a least).
I hate arguing with those morons.
75
posted on
05/03/2009 12:57:30 PM PDT
by
Rome2000
(Peace is not an option)
To: Jim Robinson; wagglebee
Thanks for the ping Wagglebee. This should be in breaking news.
76
posted on
05/03/2009 12:57:54 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
To: Jim Robinson
JimRob’s got the cutlass in his teeth!
To: relictele
That was a good breakdown. It’s an alpha site with some darn good fightin’!
To: Jim Robinson
79
posted on
05/03/2009 12:59:36 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(the complete list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Jim Robinson
80
posted on
05/03/2009 12:59:37 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,441-1,449 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson