Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pinch Sulzberger grovels before his Patron
The American Thinker ^ | May 03, 2009 | Ed Lasky

Posted on 05/03/2009 9:11:26 AM PDT by Scanian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: jnsun; ChicagahAl
The fact is Leftism, whether its called feudalism, oligarchy, communism, etc. IS the need to manipulate other human beings because one really is either incapable, too lazy, or too narcissistic, to produce things of value that others would pay for.

There's a video that discusses the various systems that I found very valuable.

There is a constant tension between the productive class (the ones who know how to make things and provide valuable services) and what I'll call "the articulate class", the people who are unable to really produce anything, but are skilled in the art of manipulating people.

21 posted on 05/03/2009 11:50:04 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Pinch: "...but fierce confidence that has enabled him to have a profound and lasting effect on millions of individuals in Mexico and neighboring countries.

Oh, the irony of that statement...or is it pure hubris?
22 posted on 05/03/2009 12:18:14 PM PDT by Moltke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian; abb; Milhous; Liz; BOBTHENAILER; bert; martin_fierro; BIGLOOK; tubebender; ...

“This is a man who has set back development in Mexico by his monopoly (or near monopoly) of the telecommunications system in that nation. He has been milking his profits for decades, blocking technological development of competitors by using his influence with politicians. The Times has historically derided this type of crony capitalism, especially when it takes place in the developing world because of its effects on the poor.”

This so called crony capitalism is nothing more than raw facism because a government or some group has basically eliminated any re competitors and awarded elite facist individuals/families with a protected monopoly or franchise.

ABCNNBCBS and the print mediots, who owned the tv nets had a monopoly with the so called news and programming. Beside the tv, they often had a monopoly or basically no competition for the fishwraps and major radio stations in their cities and areas.

To paraphrase Howie Carr, “Smug arrogance” isn’t a good business plan. It only works where the Smuggees have a monopoly. Those days are coming to an end across this nation. The elite liberal arrogant snobs, who inherited the fascist monopolies of their fathers/grandfathers are fading into the history books.


23 posted on 05/03/2009 12:35:10 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foriegn/domestic terrorists, or tax cheats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
The elite liberal arrogant snobs, who inherited the fascist monopolies of their fathers/grandfathers are fading into the history books.

GOOD RIDDANCE

24 posted on 05/03/2009 1:15:44 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (the obamination will ruin this nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: george76; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

:’) What did they have before he built the network?


25 posted on 05/03/2009 3:39:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Meanwhile in Washington DC, America is divided among the Chicago thugs;


26 posted on 05/04/2009 4:27:49 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Then there is a sort of hybrid system. Pre chavez Venezuela and the Philippines are ostensibly democracies but in practice are oligarchies. There were definitely super rich who controlled the countries from their enclaves like Forbes park in Manila.


27 posted on 05/04/2009 4:33:21 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bert
Then there is a sort of hybrid system. Pre chavez Venezuela and the Philippines are ostensibly democracies but in practice are oligarchies. There were definitely super rich who controlled the countries from their enclaves like Forbes park in Manila.

There are degrees of oligarchy. The measure of the degree is the extent to which the oligarchy can impose rules and laws on the rest of the society which the oligarchy is exempt from following. When, for example, you have to get permission or a license from an official to open a business, and the probability of getting the license depends on whether you know somebody who can grease the wheels for you, then to that degree you live in an oligarchy.

28 posted on 05/04/2009 6:41:01 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
The only Patron I would ever grovel to...


29 posted on 05/04/2009 6:45:48 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson