Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jaydubya2

Actually, I prefer the gorgeous, fully intact, ALIVE pictures of babies in the womb.

Some pro aborts actually believe that the ugly, torn up babies are an EXCUSE for abortion, they think the kids were deformed IN THE WOMB! (As dumb as that sounds, it is true!)

Think of it this way: The Nazis treated Jews like dirt, they were unwashed, lived in cramped quarters, kept in ragged clothes -— then the Nazis would say: “See, they are not LIKE us!” -—

We need people to RELATE to the baby in the womb, as they connected and related to the babies in THEIR own lives.

Anyway, though I do believe that the “pretty pictures” are more persuasive, I do NOT think it is MY job to dictate the method of communication that other people use, in this debate.

People do not CHANGE until they feel UNCOMFORTABLE -— Randall Terry and OR make people feel UNCOMFORTABLE, and that, of course, IS THE POINT of any real protest!


41 posted on 05/01/2009 12:10:50 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58

My church has a pro-life display, and among some of the most convincing items are the life size replicas of unborn babies at different ages. My kids pick them up and learn to appreciate life.


47 posted on 05/01/2009 12:21:12 PM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson