Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: woofie; Syncro
Gentleman kindly describe the declensions which lead you to observe that Alan Keyes is way off the deep end and unworthy of respect. A man who should stay away from politics.

What exactly?


4 posted on 05/01/2009 12:20:14 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

I said nothing of the sort.


6 posted on 05/01/2009 12:24:14 AM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

I still like Keyes, especially since he has settled down into being a commentator.


7 posted on 05/01/2009 12:27:37 AM PDT by GeronL (TYRANNY SENTINEL. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com LIBERTY FICTION at libertyfic.proboards.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Thanks for your question.

In this particular case it is a very cheap shot on his part. Political parties are tasked to win elections and it is certainly how Steele will be measured.

Keyes knows this and he’s tried to win elections and his most notable failure helped give us the disaster we have now.

There are a lot of things we need to be doing now to change congress next year - and there’s certainly much to debate on how - but “Steele Republicans: Like Overage Whores” is not one of them.

It’s not helpful, not smart. It does shock and get attention. Which is what Alan has been doing for years, all he’s been doing IMHO. In order have a career.

So that’s why I say it’s projection. Keyes is an attention whore.

Again, thanks for your question.


11 posted on 05/01/2009 12:43:10 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
Gentleman kindly describe the declensions which lead you to observe that Alan Keyes is way off the deep end and unworthy of respect. A man who should stay away from politics.

The fact that he thought he should be President despite never demonstrating any administrative ability. He never rallied popular support for a position, never put together a staff, never drafted legislation and then showed he could get it approved by a legislature, never demonstrated any of the many talents a President requires. If he had been a mayor of somewhere, governor of somewhere, an effective member of Congress, then I'd maybe consider him. But he's never held any political office by which to judge his talents. There's much, much more to governing than giving good speeches or having the right opinions or having an inflated ego.

26 posted on 05/01/2009 3:55:23 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson