Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Of course not.

Wrong answer apparently. Take a look at post 143 above; there's no other plausible explanation other than people counting snowstorms as years.

148 posted on 05/02/2009 6:54:22 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: wendy1946

Having refreshed my memories of the total process by reading several hundred articles in the last few days I am confident that they come close enough using current methods to satisfy any relevant argument.


149 posted on 05/02/2009 9:14:51 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: wendy1946
There are numerous discussions regarding why the planes were found buried under ice. Remember, snowfall is not even all over Greenland and this was in the South where it's warmer and where there's more precipitation. Further North where it's colder there's less precipitation.

If Ice builds up faster it squeeshes out the bottom that much faster.

Most likely no one has ever used that part of Greenland to drill ice cores. They'd want (and need) something more stable and not as wet.

150 posted on 05/02/2009 9:17:43 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson